[rules-users] Re: BRMS Server - memory Issue while execution - Critical

Thanks a lot Mark, taking the latest binary passed the load testing one a single thread atleast. Though I need to confirm due to removal of "modify()" none of the functionality has got altered. It chokes a little in the middle but is not going out of memory so I guess the leak is really fixed. One last question on this: On the Build 4MR2, I disposed the session and created a new one from the cached RuleBase and it took the load (on the code that had the memory leak) So what approach is conceptually better; Keep the same statless session for ever or for each execution request use a new one?? I talking pure performance/memory?!?! I remember you saying creating sessions is cheap; so if I have a million requests and for each one I create a new session is it still cheap? or a single stateless session servicing the requests is better? Typical Application: telephone exchange; where numbers are bombarding the engine. For each incomming request I'd assume a single session would be the most optimal solution as long as the rules are common. Right?! I'm wondering if I should also maintain an image, object = {RuleBase + Globals} so I can create a session. but I think this would have a huge performance cost to create new sessions per request. Right? Thanks for the Fix, its life saver! Thanks, Arjun