Re: [rules-users] use EObject for facts?
FactTemplates where an experimental feature that are still in the
engine, just unsupported. I wasn't happy with what we had and in order
to get 4.0 out hand to punt. Having this working is becoming a higher
priority now. We actually want to be able to support pluggeable data
objects, so while it may not be possible now if they don't follow the
JavaBean spec, you can certainly help us get the pluggeable data objects
implementation correct.
Mark
jack wu wrote:
Hi, I am wondering if it is possible to use the EMF EObject, instead
of java beans as facts. or does it require a lot of effort to make
that happen.
what EObject has is very similar to what the Fact interface requires:
Object getFieldValue(String name);
void setFieldValue(String name,
Object value);
when a java beans got passed in as fact, do we internally instantiate
a Fact object to represent the java bean? at runetime, when rules are
evaluated, do all the calls to get fact field values go through the
Fact interface? using getFieldValue()?
thanks.
jack.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pinpoint customers
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48250/*http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sp...
are looking for what you sell.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.4 KB)