Re: [rules-users] Guvnor another few questions...

Thank you Michael for your quick answer :) I certainly hope there will be somewhere some answer to the other points as well. >You can use a predicate within a pattern by selecting "Predicate" as the >Condition Column type. These compile to inline evals. It is not however >possible to define a predicate that is not part of a pattern. No idea what these are :) but I'll definitely look into them. >If, in your example, $var and $date are constants you could look into using a >Template instead of Decision Table. You'll find there is greater flexibility to what DRL you can define. I noticed I can create Templates, but I didn't think about them in that way (templates MORE flexible??). Worth a try indeed.

>The community edition (i.e. Guvnor, not JBoss BRMS) has translations for es_ES, >fr_FR, ja_JP, pt_BR, zh_CN and en_US. GWT compiles the resources away into >JScript. Depending upon your locale GWT will only dispatch the relevant bundles >to your browser.

I have the Guvnor (not JBoss BRMS) and can't see any of them. Not even the Constants.properties which should be the "regular" language file... Where do these guys get their files??? I (and my folks) would gladly share the translation - if we ever come to do one. You won't find the files in what is downloaded to your browser because GWT

>I find this observation strange, as the JAR is just stored as a BLOB in JCR and >the latest version retrieved to build suggestions available for rule authoring. >There are however known issues, logged in JIRA, with Validation not clearing >down correctly which could lead to what you report. Indeed the validation might be a cause, or it's not only the Validator leaving old skeletons behind :) A few days ago a teammate of me showed me the problem in 5.2.0.M1 AND ALSO showed be a dialog list with the actual model classes AND the old class, saying "hey but I can remove it from here and it verifies ok". Now we all upgragded to 5.2.0.Final and we can't find that dialog anymore :( I kind of miss it anyway, it would always be nice to see what classes you have in your uploaded model. Did 5.2.0.Final remove it? If you can provide a screen-shot it might nudge people's memory better?

>Not in my experience. I often upload POJO JARs (with 5.2 at least) and am able >to work with the classes defined therein without a restart. Might have to do with the above problem anyway... >I suspect you are accessing the >"Declarative Model" resources from a Guvnor repository using the Eclipse WebDAV >facilities (given the context of your surrounding questions). AFAIK, Declarative > >models are not available this way - they are stored on the Asset in the >repository using XStream to serialise the internal object graph to XML. It might > >however be an interesting idea to provide a means to retrieve their DRL >equivalent through WebDAV. If you'd like to pursue this please raise a JIRA >capturing your requirement and details of your specification. Correct, this is what I was expecting: some support from the Eclipse Guvnor plugin. I can imagine however that this would be just priority pit-bottom on the developers todo list :) >Why is this a problem? As you say the field, presumably privately called >"aThing" is accessible via the getter "AThing"? >Does your DRL not compile? Well this is not a "real" problem, it works also this way. But the field should look like all others: the "getMyField()" accessor of the Java POJO will show "myField", but "getAThing()" will show "AThing" - notice the different capitalization. Thank you, JC _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users