Re: [rules-users] import statements and performance

do import statements have any impact on the performance of a .drl or .rfm ? I plan to make some templates (.drl and .rfm) to use by the business guys - from my UML model I know which entities were used from which Services, so I can pre-configure a .drl/.rfm for each service (= drool package) and its easier for the business guys to create Rules. they know that there are orders, offers, addresses etc. but they have no knowledge about java package structures but then it will be that there are many unused import statements - I think this would create no runtime - performance issues. am I right ? and then I've noticed that Drools supports import a.b.c.* which means all classes from package a.b.c were known, but not from subpackages like a.b.c.d.e. there's nothing in the docs - so I obly want to confirm that this is right. (inside the BRMS I noticed that .* was not supported with import statements) thanks for info ekke -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/import-statements-and-performance-tf4511270.html#a1... Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users