That makes it compile, but during the run I get:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.drools.reteoo.builder.BuildUtils.createBetaNodeConstraint(
BuildUtils.java:168)
at org.drools.reteoo.builder.GroupElementBuilder$NotBuilder.build(
GroupElementBuilder.java:231)
at org.drools.reteoo.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(
GroupElementBuilder.java:70)
at org.drools.reteoo.builder.GroupElementBuilder$AndBuilder.build(
GroupElementBuilder.java:112)
at org.drools.reteoo.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(
GroupElementBuilder.java:70)
at org.drools.reteoo.builder.ReteooRuleBuilder.addSubRule(
ReteooRuleBuilder.java:136)
at org.drools.reteoo.builder.ReteooRuleBuilder.addRule(
ReteooRuleBuilder.java:109)
at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooBuilder.addRule(ReteooBuilder.java:116)
at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase.addRule(ReteooRuleBase.java:262)
at org.drools.common.AbstractRuleBase.addPackage(AbstractRuleBase.java
:333)
at com.sample.DroolsTest.readRule(DroolsTest.java:66)
at com.sample.DroolsTest.main(DroolsTest.java:23)
-Chris
On 10/4/07, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com> wrote:
What if you try "not (Foo(id == 10) from $foos)"?
------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Chris West
*Sent:* 04 October 2007 16:59
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-users] using from with not
It does not compile. The error is:
unknown:32:20 mismatched token: [@243,682:685='from',<38>,32:20];
expecting type THEN
-Chris
On 10/4/07, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com> wrote:
>
> Does it not compile (in which case can you post the error)?
>
> Or does it not activate?
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Chris West
> *Sent:* 04 October 2007 16:03
> *To:* Rules Users List
> *Subject:* [rules-users] using from with not
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know why rule "GoodBye2" below does not compile, but rule
> "GoodBye1" does compile using Drools 4.0.0? The only difference is the
> "not". Shouldn't this be valid?
>
> Thanks,
> -Chris
>
>
> package com.sample
>
> import com.sample.DroolsTest.Message;
> import com.sample.DroolsTest.Foo;
> import java.util.List;
>
> rule "Hello World"
> when
> m : Message( status == Message.HELLO, message : message )
> then
> System.out.println( message );
> m.setMessage( "Goodbye cruel world" );
> m.setStatus( Message.GOODBYE );
> update( m );
> end
>
> rule "GoodBye1"
> no-loop true
> when
> m : Message( status == Message.GOODBYE, message : message,
> $foos: foos )
> Foo(id == 10) from $foos
> then
> System.out.println ( message );
> m.setMessage( message );
>
> end
>
> rule "GoodBye2"
> no-loop true
> when
> m : Message( status == Message.GOODBYE, message : message,
> $foos: foos )
> not Foo(id == 10) from $foos
> then
> System.out.println( message );
> m.setMessage( message );
>
> end
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users