7:22 p.m.
I think I got the point....
This is the rule (table generated) which sets the "upronto" field.
(It should have been fired in a previous ruleflow-node)
package com.rules.ConsolidateData;
#generated from Decision Table
import com.engine.wrappers.ContractWrapper;
import com.engine.enums.Pronto;
#From row number: 13
rule "Pronto_13"
(RULEFLOW GROUP IS MISSING!!!!!)
when
cw: ContractWrapper(mycontract.serviceDetail.pronto == "Y",
mycontract.serviceDetail.pronto == "Y")
then
cw.setUpronto(Pronto.Y);
System.out.println("PS1"+cw.getMycontract().getId());
end
I think I DEFINED "THE RULEFLOW-GROUP" IN THE WRONG WAY in the .xls table!!!
So, I think... the Pronto_13 rule has been fired after the ScorePronto rule.
I tell you how I defined it....
In the same column where I have "Ruleset", "Import" and
"Variables" I put "RULEFLOW-GROUP" as well...it is as follows:
|Ruleset | ... |
|Import | ...import ... ContractWrapper...|
|Variables | ... |
|RULEFLOW-GROUP | Scoring | <--- HERE!
Is it correct?
I thought this is what was meant in http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1077
In case this were not the problem I really would not know what to do.... now I go to
sleep... here in rome is quite late!
I hope tomorrow to work it out.
Thank You for your Help Edson!
Buona notte.
Massi
"Edson Tirelli" <tirelli(a)post.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:e6dd5ba30802161533m1d6e035cq9e12dd1b148fa71@mail.gmail.com...
Need to see the full test case to be able to understand if it is a bug or not,
because the expression in the LHS is using the ShadowProxy, while the one in the RHS is
not... so, it may be a bug or it may not... depends when and how you are setting the
upronto field.
[]s
Edson
2008/2/16, mmquelo(a)gmail.com <mmquelo(a)gmail.com>:
Look at this....
I have got a "ContractWrapper" fact inserted into WM.
It wraps a "Contract" object and some "enums" fields.
One of these fields is "upronto":
public
class ContractWrapper extends BaseOmPersistentWithAssignedId{
Contract
mycontract=null;
...
Pronto upronto = null;
...
<getters and setters....>
...
}
"upronto" is an insance of a "Pronto" java enum:
public
enum Pronto {
N
,
UNKNOWN
,
Y
;
}
"Pronto" can be : (Y, N, UNKNOWN)
Here is the rule which reasons over this enum:
(ofcourse I have got a Request into WM as well)
rule "ScorePronto"
dialect "mvel"
ruleflow-group "Scoring"
when
$r:Request( $mc:mainContract != null )
$cw_p:ContractWrapper($c_w_p:mycontract == $mc, eval(upronto != Pronto.Y))
then
System.out.println("Test Result: "+($cw_p.upronto == Pronto.Y))
end
Any guesses for the output???
Well....
Test Result: true
HOW COMES???????????????????
I mean ... the test "eval(upronto != Pronto.Y)" returned
"true".... It means that the rule
engine sees upronto <> Pronto.Y!, doesn't it??!!!!
So... why do I get "upronto == Pronto.Y" in the RHS????
What the.........&$%%&()%%$/%£....sorry....but having these
kind of problems during saturday night is not so pleaseant!
T-T
I really hope you can help me with a workaround to this issue.
Bye
Massi
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users