Re: [rules-users] Drools & "Query by Example"?
Hi Mark, Greg
Mark Proctor wrote:
Someone poppe onto irc a few months back, claiming they did this for
their company and would provide the code as a patch - never heard
anything after that though :( So if that person is read, please
upload your patch to JIRA :)
> Maybe if it's useful enough an operator could be added to
Drools
> that does the same thing. "~=" maybe?
Using the function to simulate the open world assumption is a neat idea!
The eval() requirements not so much....
Mark, as I am not afraid of digging into the code base... any pointers
where I should start looking to add this behaviour? Some class or
package name would help as drools is not so small :)
cu, Michael