It's "Rete", not "Reto". Being Rete-based is reportedly
disappearing with
6.x.
I'm not sure what sort of criterion the "graphical representation" of rules
should represent. There is a way for displaying the Rete network resulting
from a rule, but it's not something over which a user like a "business
analyst" would get all excited.
Some backward chaining functionality is indeed available, although it
cannot be compared with what you have in, say, Prolog.
-W
On 8 July 2013 08:33, Fatma Zaheer <fmaqsoom(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Rules users,
Can anyone of you verify the information in the table mentioned below on
JBoss Drools ( business rules management systems)?
Thanks in advance,
Evaluation Criteria **** JBoss Drools**** Software Platform**** Java
**** Facilitate for rules testing **** Yes**** Level of language of
rules**** High**** Type of target organization**** All**** Coding
of rules required**** Yes**** Business analysts control business logic*
*** Yes**** Rules based web application**** Yes**** On Cloud****
n.a.**** Forward/Backward chaining**** Forward chaining **** Uses
Reto-base or constraint base rules engine**** Reto-Base**** Graphical
representation of rules**** Yes****
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users