I guess we'll have to see class IndividualDecision, at least everything in
connection with that loanToValue: field declaration and getter and setter.
-W
2010/4/12 Ade Timi <adeyinka.timi(a)nathean.com>
This is precisely how I expect it to be expressed. When I express in
this
way I get this error message:
BuildError: Unable to create Field Extractor for 'loanToValue' of
'[ClassObjectType class=com.nathean.rules.IndividualDecision]' in rule 'G2
Equity in Asset'
even though it is a variable in my IndividualDecision class. I have 3 other
rule files that have expression in this simple manner and they produce no
errors and are fine.
But for this, It only lets me use eval or have something like this:
*rule* "G2 Equity in Asset"
*ruleflow-group* "goods"
*when*
$d : IndividualDecision()
Individual($d.loanToValue < 85.0)
*then*
…
//System.out.println((Double.valueOf("85")).doubleValue());
System.out.println("loanToValue: " + ($d.getLoanToValue()));
*End*
I understand that it is pointless having that 2nd line in the when
section, but it’s the only way it picks up the variables in the
IndividualDecision class with no errors. I don’t know why I can’t do this
with this particular rules file. I am using Eclipse. Could there be some
drools configuration issue with this file?
-A
------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Wolfgang Laun
*Sent:* 12 April 2010 14:30
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Double Handling
Well, then drop the
dialect "mvel"
and write the pattern as
$d : IndividualDecision( loanToVal < 85.0 )
There's no visible need to use mvel.
Or eval: the simplest form for constraints is always best.
-W
2010/4/12 Ade Timi <adeyinka.timi(a)nathean.com>
Many thanks for the response!
Yes it fires when I use 85.0 instead, but it obviously shouldn’t as the
condition is false. My code now looks like this:
*rule* "G2 Equity in Asset"
*ruleflow-group* "goods"
*dialect* "mvel"
*when*
$d : IndividualDecision(*eval*($d.getLoanToValue() < 85.0))
*then*
$d.setGoodCount($d.incGoodCount());
$d.setMessage("0065: G2: Good: Good Equity in Deal");
//System.out.println((Double.valueOf("85")).doubleValue());
System.out.println("loanToValue: " + ($d.getLoanToValue()));
*end*
I still get the print output of 92000.0, which is as I expect but I don’t
expect the rule to be fired at all. The weird thing is that when I change
the condition to ‘>’ which is the true condition it never fires! I’m at a
loss as to why this is happening.
- Ade
------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Wolfgang Laun
*Sent:* 11 April 2010 09:11
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Double Handling
You are comparing a double to a String ("85"). Although MVEL might convert
strings to numbers, I wouldn't use this without some cogent reason.
Do you have this unexpected firing also when you use a double literal,
i.e., 85.0 ?
-W
2010/4/9 Ade Timi <adeyinka.timi(a)nathean.com>
Hi,
I am new to Drools. I am having a problem comparing 2 double values. I have
a Java class with a double attribute called loanToValue. The loanToValue is
been read from an XML file and the value is 92000.0. Based on this value I
do not expect this rule to be fired, but for some reason it does. And the
print statement returns 92000.0. Does anyone know what I’m doing wrong? My
rule looks as follows:
*rule* "G2 Equity in Asset"
*ruleflow-group* "goods"
*dialect* "mvel"
*when*
$d : IndividualDecision()
Individual(*eval*($d.getLoanToValue() < "85"))
*then*
System.out.println("loanToValue: " + ($d.getLoanToValue()));
*end*
* *
Thanks,
Ade
*Adeyinka Timi* | Technical Supprt | *Nathean Technologies Ltd*
Registered Office 3 Lyncon Court, IDA Science & Technology Park,
Snugborough Road, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland
*T +353 1 685 3001* | VOIP 076 615 1117 | *E adeyinka.timi(a)nathean.com* |
<
http://www.nathean.com/>www.nathean.com
Incorporated in Ireland, No. 339972
The information appearing in this email and any files transmitted with it
is confidential and may not be reproduced, modified, distributed,
transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written
permission of Nathean Technologies Ltd. It is intended solely for the use of
the addressee(s). Nathean Technologies Ltd, its directors, officers and
employees do not accept liability for any loss or damage of any nature
howsoever arising pertaining to the use of information appearing in this
email and/or any files transmitted with it. Whilst this email has been
checked for the presence of computer viruses, Nathean Technologies Ltd does
not, except as required by law, represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the
integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the
communication is free of errors, viruses, interception or interference.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users