Observing that the forall could be replaced by
not FICO( creditBorrowerNumber == $borrowerNumber1, validScoreIndicator ==
true )
what happens if you use this CE?
-W
2009/10/20 <Tom.E.Murphy(a)wellsfargo.com>
I’m having trouble with the forall CE.
I have the following rule:
rule "RS6524"
when
Borrower ( $borrowerNumber1 : borrowerNumber )
forall
(
$fico : FICO (creditBorrowerNumber ==
$borrowerNumber1 )
FICO (this == $fico, validScoreIndicator ==
false)
)
then
System.out.println("RS6524 fired”);
end
I pass in objects whose data is described below:
*Borrower* { borrowerNumber = *1* }
*FICO* { creditBorrowerNumber = *1*, validScoreIndicator = *true* }
Although the rule should not fire with this data, it does.
Am I misunderstanding the way this CE should work?
*Tom Murphy
**Business Process Consultant
Wells Fargo HCFG - CORE Deal Decisioning Platform
800 S. Jordan Creek Parkway | West Des Moines, IA 50266
MAC: **X2301-01B
**Office: **515 324 4853** | Mobile: 941 320 8014
**This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee,
you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message
or any information herein. If you have received this message in error,
please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
message. Thank you for your cooperation.*
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users