[rules-users] Order of Execution on Messages

We are currently authoring rules using Drools 5.3 and using jBPM 5.2 for orchestration. The situation we have is as follows: Certain groups of rules can execute on n number of messages in any order(i.e the order in which the consequences occur does not matter). The problem comes in later in the process when those same n messages need to have their consequences happen in a certain order. Is there a good way to handle this? We have thought about appending messages to a queue and just operating on one message at a time however this seems slow. In addition when utilizing jBPM and drools what is the best way to batch data in and out of the session. I understand starting a new session is cheap but was hoping there may be a way to have jBPM insert n records at a time and just continue to read from the db until no more records are returned. TIA! -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Order-of-Execution-on-Messages-tp378401... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.