I already have tons of rules today in drl file. I've both jBPM5 and drools
plugin installed on eclipse 3.6. I didn't find a way to convert these drl
files to jBPM to visualize the existing rules.
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Esteban Aliverti <
esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If what you are looking for is to graphically model the execution
order of
a set of rules, then the best you can do is to go to jBPM5. jBPM5 is a
process engine where, among other things, you can have tasks (nodes in the
process) activating and deactivating rule-flow-groups (yes, I know, the
name is kind of old) in the agenda. The concept of a rule-flow-group is
similar to the agenda-group where rules are only executed only if the group
where they belong is 'active'. Using jBPM5 you can use a 'Rule Task'
node
to automatically activate a particular rule-flow-group.
Best Regards,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
- Developer @
http://www.plugtree.com
- Blog @
http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:08 PM, al so <volkswak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> One could control the rule execution order using various different
> constructs (like salience, etc) within the rule definition file. Is there
> any UI tool that can take the drl file and visualize the rule execution
> flow? Does it help the section of audience who doesn't understand the
> concepts like agenda-group? Is jBPM the right tool in such scenario where
> all I have is bunch of drl files (no Process is involved here). i.e. try to
> visualize the Rule Execution order.
>
> This is where I was investigating the use of RuleFlow and later found
> that jBPM obsoletes it. Then was curious about how ruleflow-group is
> integrated with jBPM? Unable to find the solution yet.
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org>wrote:
>
>> On 30/06/2012 00:08, al so wrote:
>>
>> looks like one can't activate a ruleflow-group inside a drl file? Only
>> available via UI?
>> I was thinking there'll be some kind of setFocus way to control rule
>> execution using this ruleflow-group.
>>
>> For the 6.0 development cycle we are looking into alternative approaches
>> to handling rule execution orchestration. Nothing to show yet.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing
listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users