Re: [rules-users] Drools Flow process question...

I tried inserting FooInstance as a fact but then it seems to have nothing to do with the process. In my second rule I am trying to get at the WorkFlowProcess in my constraints but this rule will not consistantly fire. It only seems to work when the Test run is there. I found this in my log. <org.drools.audit.event.RuleFlowVariableLogEvent> <variableId>Instance</variableId> <variableInstanceId>Instance</variableInstanceId> <objectToString>null</objectToString> <processId>StudioSampleListener</processId> <processName>Studio Sample Listener Flow</processName> <processInstanceId>0</processInstanceId> <type>32</type> </org.drools.audit.event.RuleFlowVariableLogEvent> <org.drools.audit.event.RuleFlowVariableLogEvent> <variableId>Instance</variableId> <variableInstanceId>Instance</variableInstanceId> <objectToString>com.rrd.xspace.drools.FooInstance@6a7e4127</objectToString> <processId>StudioSampleListener</processId> <processName>Studio Sample Listener Flow</processName> <processInstanceId>0</processInstanceId> <type>33</type> </org.drools.audit.event.RuleFlowVariableLogEvent> All the other log entries have processInstanceId 1. This seems strange. I modeled my test code after the example in the Drools JBoss Rules 5.0 Developer book and he seems to have variables that are access in constraints of rules: rule amountNotValid ruleflow-group "validateLoan" when Loan(amount == null || amount < 0) then insert(new DefaultMessage()); end And Loan was not inserted into the session, but is just a registered variable. Is the book's example worthless? Bob -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-process-q... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.