Re: [rules-users] Implementing Timers With Drools PersistenceEnabled

Santosh, Based on your description, different processes should be started. Do you have a simple standalone example that shows this behaviour, so I can take a look? If not, using an audit logger might help in determining which rules are fired and which processes are being started. Kris ----- Original Message ----- From: santosh mukherjee To: Rules Users List Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 10:03 AM Subject: Re: [rules-users] Implementing Timers With Drools PersistenceEnabled Hi, I have a sample drl file in which I have written multiple rules. For each different rules when get fired I have started different processes. for eg: Rule1 when: some condition then: drools.getWorkingMemory.startprocess("id1"); Rule2 when: some condition then: drools.getWorkingMemory.startprocess("id2"); But the problem is that only that rule flow process gets fired every time which I have added to builder last. Also it is clear that it goes inside the then clause of Rule2 suppose but then again it starts process with id1. Any help on how to resolve this or why is it happening is welcom, Thanks Santosh Mukherjee On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:39 AM, nanic23 <nanic23(a)hotmail.com&gt; wrote: Hi cafebabe, Thanks for your comment. I agree with you that work item ids are database primary keys but in this simple (very simple) case I just decided to harcoded as I know for a fact that the work item id is 1 because that is the only work item and each time I run the test the tables are dropped and recreated. So, there is never more than one row in the workItemInfo table and the only row always has 1 as its id. I could have stored the work item id or a work item object as a variable (like you mentioned) but in this case wouldn't make a difference for the timers. Are timers working for you when you use persistence? I do complete work items by workItem.getId() in all my code (other than this simple example :)). My problem is NOT completing the work item, my problem is triggering timers when persistence is enabled. The timers don't even trigger, thing that should happen before even trying to complete the work item. Thanks, Nick. -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Implementing-Timers-W... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm