Is there a reliable way to find an EventFactHandle instance buried within the
TupleEntryQueue’s and the PhreakPropagationContext’s?
The multiple containers of interface/impl’s makes it nearly impossible to write a “good”
test that can peak under the hood where this memory leak is being held. If there is a
recommended way to do it, I’d be happy to do so.
On Jul 13, 2014, at 7:31 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
Could you submit a unit test as a pull request?
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.5.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-...
Add it to here, and follow existing conventions:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/drools-compiler/src/test...
Mark
On 11 Jul 2014, at 20:38, Kent Anderson <kent.anderson(a)psware.com> wrote:
> We have found a workaround that eliminates the leftover event (gone from Working
Memory, but not from the JVM memory):
>
> The rule “forget it ever happened” (seen below) causes the problem. Re-writing it to
remove the check for RAISE in the LHS eliminated the memory leak. Of course, our
application requires the check for RAISE, so it can be accomplished by manually querying
working memory from the RHS. It’s ugly, but it resolved the issue.
>
> query existsRaise($id)
> $raise : MyEvent( eventState == EventState.RAISE, eventId == $id )
> end
>
> rule "process clear"
> no-loop
> when
> $clear : MyEvent(eventState == EventState.CLEAR, $clearId : eventId)
> then
> QueryResults results = kcontext.getKieRuntime().getQueryResults(
"existsRaise", $clearId );
> if (results.size() == 0) {
> System.out.println( "Forwarding CLEAR(" + $clearId + ")" );
> } else {
> System.out.println("Forgetting RAISE/CLEAR(" + $clearId +
")");
> for (QueryResultsRow row : results){
> MyEvent raise = (MyEvent) row.get ("$raise");
> delete(raise);
> }
> }
> delete($clear);
> end
>
> This appears to be a similar situation to
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-498.
>
>
>
> On Jul 10, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Kent Anderson <kent.anderson(a)psware.com> wrote:
>
>> Correction: The original post did not include another rule that exists in the
stream. The memory leak does not appear unless both rules are active in the stream.
>>
>> declare MyEvent
>> @role(event)
>> @timestamp(timestamp)
>> end
>>
>> /* If a RAISE is buffered for N seconds, send it out */
>> rule "forward raise"
>> no-loop
>> duration (3s)
>> when
>> $raise : MyEvent(eventState == EventState.RAISE, $raiseId : eventId)
>> then
>> System.out.println("Forwarding RAISE(" + $raiseId + ")");
>> delete($raise);
>> end
>>
>> /* When CLEAR, and buffered, clear them both out */
>> rule "forget it ever happened"
>> no-loop
>> when
>> $clear : MyEvent(eventState == EventState.CLEAR, $clearId : eventId)
>> $raise : MyEvent(eventState == EventState.RAISE, eventId == $clearId)
>> then
>> System.out.println("Forgetting RAISE/CLEAR(" + $clearId +
")");
>> delete($clear);
>> delete($raise);
>> end
>>
>>
>> On Jul 10, 2014, at 2:50 PM, Kent Anderson <kent.anderson(a)psware.com>
wrote:
>>
>>> The following rule produces a memory leak in Drools 6.1.0-SNAPSHOT:
>>>
>>> (Stream mode)
>>>
>>> declare MyEvent
>>> @role(event)
>>> @timestamp(timestamp)
>>> end
>>>
>>> /* If a RAISE is buffered for N seconds, send it out */
>>> rule "forward raise"
>>> no-loop
>>> duration (3s)
>>> when
>>> $raise : MyEvent(eventState == EventState.RAISE, $raiseId : eventId)
>>> then
>>> System.out.println("Forwarding RAISE(" + $raiseId +
")");
>>> delete($raise);
>>> end
>>>
>>>
>>> I see the rule fire as expected, printing out the message 3 seconds after the
event is added into the session. While the event is waiting, I see a FactCount of 1 in
the session. After the rule fires, the fact count goes to 0. However, using JVisualVm,
querying the heap dump shows 1 instance of MyEvent, referenced by an EventFactHandle and
several other Drools objects.
>>>
>>> Is this a bug, or is there a better way to write this rule so Drools’
internals let go of the object after it is no longer a fact?
>>>
>>> <PastedGraphic-1.png>
>>>
>>> <PastedGraphic-2.png>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users