Re: [rules-users] 'else' in rule

I agree that I jumped in on an effort to define a requirement in terms of a solution ... however, people generally understand else and otherwise, so there is some justification in saying you want something to work like them. I don't care what the underlying mechanism is, but as it stands now we have to write a rule "When (condition-A)" and then another rule "When not (condition-A)" ... and I think that makes the rules more difficult to understand and to maintain. Thanks Ron -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/else-in-rule-tp3264337p3564318.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.