Hello. We have a very simple rules file that works as expected when running as a JUnit test in Eclipse with Maven dependencies, but fails when it is executing in ServiceMix with OSGi integration. The code is just like : raw> Map<String, Object> dialog = new LinkedHashMap<>(); KieSession kieSession = kieContainer.newKieSession("MyKSession"); kieSession.setGlobal("dialog", dialog); kieSession.insert(problem); kieSession.fireAllRules(); kieSession.dispose(); The rules file : And the kmodule.xml : The compilation error is about Java 7 syntax elements (as generics or thousand separators in number literals for example), and seems to indicate that in this case the compiler is not the same, and it expects another Java syntax. No error is reported when the KieContainer is created from the KModule.xml, but the following error occurs when using it for KSession creation. This occurs both with the prepackaged feature ( http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/drools/drools-karaf-features/6.1.0.Beta... ), or with an adapted one. For example, the Maven dependancies classpath in eclipse mentions newer versions of the Eclipse's ECJ. But changing the version of bundles has no effect... What is missing in the feature to activate the correct rules compiler ? Thanks for your help ? Regards. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-compilation-error-with-OSGi-integ... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Hello. Here is the first lines of the error message : 14:58:57,457 | ERROR | tp1946301910-151 | AbstractKieModule | 239 - org.drools.compiler - 6.1.0.20140429-1643 | Unable to build KieBaseModel:MyKBase Rule Compilation error : [Rule name='Main Rule'] my/tests/drools/osgi/expert/rules/Rule_Main_Rule1409557233.java (8:649) : Incorrect number of arguments for type HashMap<K,V>; it cannot be parameterized with arguments <?> my/tests/drools/osgi/expert/rules/Rule_Main_Rule1409557233.java (8:666) : Syntax error on token "<", ? expected after this token I have found the explanation and a workaround : put it all with a strict "1.5" syntax in the RHS ! In this current case, do not use <> to infere the generic type, but use the expected declared types instead. After a rather touchy remote debug of the ServiceMix runtime to inspect what is different from the Junit tests, I think that the problem comes from the classloader that is associated with the Kie container. Before compilation the language source and target level is set with version 1.7 as expected, but in the nameEnvironment that is passed to the JavaCompiler (indeed, ecj compiler), the droolsClassloader is of type "org/apache/felix/framework/ModuleImpl$ModuleClassLoaderJava5". As its name seems to incidate, I'm afraid that the Karaf/Felix loader is originally built in 1.5. I've read some posts about the eclipse compiler that perhaps takes into account the caller compliance to adapt its compilation language level. Class loaders seem to be a serious problem when using Drools in complex environment such as a OSGi one... Please, could you confirm my analysis, and, if you have one, propose any better solution ? I don't know, for example, if it's possible to influence Karaf to use different levels of bundle class loaders... Thanks a lot. Regards. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-compilation-error-with-OSGi-integ... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Hello. I have no such kind test with Pax Exam. Should you send me a simple maven project example using a Karaf container ? Back to the problem, a very simple rule with something like that in the RHS always fails when deployed in a bundle whose class loader is the felix one : List<String> l = new ArrayList<>(); that must be fixed with : List<String> l = new ArrayList<String>(); or int n = 1_000; that fails instead of : int n = 1000; FYI, I use ServiceMix 4.5.3. Thanks again. Regards. 2014-05-20 15:41 GMT+02:00 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt;: A test case will be required to reproduce your problem. Do you have a > pax-exam test ? > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Ephemeris Lappis < > ephemeris.lappis(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> Here is the first lines of the error message : >> >> >> 14:58:57,457 | ERROR | tp1946301910-151 | AbstractKieModule >> | >> 239 - org.drools.compiler - 6.1.0.20140429-1643 | Unable to build >> KieBaseModel:MyKBase >> Rule Compilation error : [Rule name='Main Rule'] >> my/tests/drools/osgi/expert/rules/Rule_Main_Rule1409557233.java >> (8:649) : >> Incorrect number of arguments for type HashMap<K,V>; it cannot be >> parameterized with arguments <?> >> my/tests/drools/osgi/expert/rules/Rule_Main_Rule1409557233.java >> (8:666) : >> Syntax error on token "<", ? expected after this token >> >> >> I have found the explanation and a workaround : put it all with a strict >> "1.5" syntax in the RHS ! In this current case, do not use <> to infere >> the >> generic type, but use the expected declared types instead. >> >> After a rather touchy remote debug of the ServiceMix runtime to inspect >> what >> is different from the Junit tests, I think that the problem comes from >> the >> classloader that is associated with the Kie container. Before compilation >> the language source and target level is set with version 1.7 as >> expected, >> but in the nameEnvironment that is passed to the JavaCompiler (indeed, >> ecj >> compiler), the droolsClassloader is of type >> "org/apache/felix/framework/ModuleImpl$ModuleClassLoaderJava5". As its >> name >> seems to incidate, I'm afraid that the Karaf/Felix loader is originally >> built in 1.5. >> >> I've read some posts about the eclipse compiler that perhaps takes into >> account the caller compliance to adapt its compilation language level. >> >> Class loaders seem to be a serious problem when using Drools in complex >> environment such as a OSGi one... >> >> Please, could you confirm my analysis, and, if you have one, propose any >> better solution ? I don't know, for example, if it's possible to >> influence >> Karaf to use different levels of bundle class loaders... >> >> Thanks a lot. >> >> Regards. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-compilation-error-with-OSGi-integ... >> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

In this case it's not a global, but a temporary variable in the rule consequence. Indeed, the problem is not only about generics, but impacts all the syntax elements that may have changed since Java 1.5, and make the rules Java compiler fails when running in ServiceMix. As I said before, the workaround is quite easy, changing all the Java code to be compliant with the compilation level. The question is just about a confirmation of the Felix's class loader (org/apache/felix/framework/ ModuleImpl$ModuleClassLoaderJava5) in the compiler's behavior, and a better solution to be able to write RHS with a 'modern' syntax. Thanks. 2014-05-20 16:56 GMT+02:00 Charles Moulliard [via Drools] <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029629&i=0> >: > Is it a list that you would like to use as global param ? If this is the > case, maybe change your rule & code like that > > //GET A KSESSION > StatefulKnowledgeSession ksession = > kbase.newStatefulKnowledgeSession(); > > //now create some test data > ksession.insert( new Cheese( "stilton", > 42 ) ); > ksession.insert( new Person( "michael", > "stilton", > 42 ) ); > final List<String> list = new ArrayList<String>(); > ksession.setGlobal( "list", > list ); > > ksession.fireAllRules(); > > System.out.println(list); > > ksession.dispose(); > > Rule > > template header > age > type > log > > package org.drools.examples.templates; > > global java.util.List list; > > template "cheesefans" > > rule "Cheese fans_(a){row.rowNumber}&quot; > when > Person(age == @{age}) > Cheese(type == "@{type}") > then > list.add("@{log}"); > end > end template > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Ephemeris Lappis <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=0> > > wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> I have no such kind test with Pax Exam. Should you send me a simple >> maven project example using a Karaf container ? >> >> Back to the problem, a very simple rule with something like that in the >> RHS always fails when deployed in a bundle whose class loader is the felix >> one : >> >> List<String> l = new ArrayList<>(); >> that must be fixed with : >> List<String> l = new ArrayList<String>(); >> >> or >> >> int n = 1_000; >> that fails instead of : >> int n = 1000; >> >> FYI, I use ServiceMix 4.5.3. >> >> Thanks again. >> Regards. >> >> >> >> 2014-05-20 15:41 GMT+02:00 Charles Moulliard <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=1> >> >: >> >> A test case will be required to reproduce your problem. Do you have a >>> pax-exam test ? >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Ephemeris Lappis <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=2> >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> Here is the first lines of the error message : >>>> >>>> >>>> 14:58:57,457 | ERROR | tp1946301910-151 | AbstractKieModule >>>> | >>>> 239 - org.drools.compiler - 6.1.0.20140429-1643 | Unable to build >>>> KieBaseModel:MyKBase >>>> Rule Compilation error : [Rule name='Main Rule'] >>>> >>>> my/tests/drools/osgi/expert/rules/Rule_Main_Rule1409557233.java (8:649) : >>>> Incorrect number of arguments for type HashMap<K,V>; it cannot be >>>> parameterized with arguments <?> >>>> >>>> my/tests/drools/osgi/expert/rules/Rule_Main_Rule1409557233.java (8:666) : >>>> Syntax error on token "<", ? expected after this token >>>> >>>> >>>> I have found the explanation and a workaround : put it all with a >>>> strict >>>> "1.5" syntax in the RHS ! In this current case, do not use <> to >>>> infere the >>>> generic type, but use the expected declared types instead. >>>> >>>> After a rather touchy remote debug of the ServiceMix runtime to >>>> inspect what >>>> is different from the Junit tests, I think that the problem comes from >>>> the >>>> classloader that is associated with the Kie container. Before >>>> compilation >>>> the language source and target level is set with version 1.7 as >>>> expected, >>>> but in the nameEnvironment that is passed to the JavaCompiler (indeed, >>>> ecj >>>> compiler), the droolsClassloader is of type >>>> "org/apache/felix/framework/ModuleImpl$ModuleClassLoaderJava5". As its >>>> name >>>> seems to incidate, I'm afraid that the Karaf/Felix loader is originally >>>> built in 1.5. >>>> >>>> I've read some posts about the eclipse compiler that perhaps takes into >>>> account the caller compliance to adapt its compilation language level. >>>> >>>> Class loaders seem to be a serious problem when using Drools in complex >>>> environment such as a OSGi one... >>>> >>>> Please, could you confirm my analysis, and, if you have one, propose >>>> any >>>> better solution ? I don't know, for example, if it's possible to >>>> influence >>>> Karaf to use different levels of bundle class loaders... >>>> >>>> Thanks a lot. >>>> >>>> Regards. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-compilation-error-with-OSGi-integ... >>>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=3> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Charles Moulliard >>> Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=4> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=5> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=6> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > discussion below: > > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-compilation-error-with-OSGi-integ... > To unsubscribe from Rules compilation error with OSGi integration > (6.1.0.Beta3), click here. > NAML<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=... > ------------------------------ View this message in context: Re: [rules-users] Rules compilation error with OSGi integration (6.1.0.Beta3)<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-compilation-error... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-User-forum-f47000.htm... Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Hello. Although without much conviction, I've tried the "Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment: J2SE-1.7", but it doesn't change the compilation level of the rules... As I said in a previous answer, I don't know exactly how to do it, but I think the solution may be in the way that Drools takes the classloader passed by the application to have access to specific classes like the usually imported beans used in the rules. Indeed, perhaps that instead of using directly this classloader, for its tasks, among of them the rules compilation, it should be possible to use some kind of enriched classloader that carries all the Drools needed packages, and delegates application classes resolution to the application's one. What do you think of that ? Regards. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-compilation-error-with-OSGi-integ... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Hello. I could try to test on ServiceMix 5 that embeds Karaf 2.3.4, but for my concrete project, the customer current platform uses a ServiceMix 4.5.3 which is not really possible to change today while many other modules are already deployed. Did you try in your environment the test project that I attached yesterday ? There is a rule in the project with an "accumulate" that generates java code that is not compiled because of missing indirect dependancy despite of the Import-Package that I've copied from your examples. Hence my idea of a "proxy" classloader between Drools and its compiler and the classloader provided by the application bundle, and avoid the dynamic import that breaks the good practices... 2014-05-21 11:48 GMT+02:00 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt;: If you look to my example posted previously there are no issues. Can you > make a test using just Apache Karaf 2.3.x with Drools 6.1.0.Beta3 and tell > me what happen. Which JDK do you sue ? > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Ephemeris Lappis < > ephemeris.lappis(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> Although without much conviction, I've tried the >> "Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment: J2SE-1.7", but it doesn't change >> the >> compilation level of the rules... >> >> As I said in a previous answer, I don't know exactly how to do it, but I >> think the solution may be in the way that Drools takes the classloader >> passed by the application to have access to specific classes like the >> usually imported beans used in the rules. Indeed, perhaps that instead of >> using directly this classloader, for its tasks, among of them the rules >> compilation, it should be possible to use some kind of enriched >> classloader >> that carries all the Drools needed packages, and delegates application >> classes resolution to the application's one. >> >> What do you think of that ? >> >> Regards. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-compilation-error-with-OSGi-integ... >> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Which version of karaf / felix do you use ? I'm using this version of Felix/karaf Karaf version 2.3.0.redhat-610379 OSGi Framework org.apache.felix.framework - 4.0.3.redhat-610379 Java Virtual Machine Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM version 24.51-b03 Version 1.7.0_51 I have made a test with this rule packaged with this maven module ( https://github.com/cmoulliard/droolsjbpm-osgi-examples#simple-rule-example) and that works in both cases package org.drools.example.drink; import org.drools.example.model.Person import java.util.List import java.util.ArrayList; rule "CanDrink" when p : Person( age >= 21 ) then p.setCanDrink(true); List<String> l = new ArrayList<>(); end OR package org.drools.example.drink; import org.drools.example.model.Person import java.util.List import java.util.ArrayList; rule "CanDrink" when p : Person( age >= 21 ) then p.setCanDrink(true); List<String> l = new ArrayList<String>(); end On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Ephemeris Lappis < ephemeris.lappis(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > In this case it's not a global, but a temporary variable in the rule > consequence. Indeed, the problem is not only about generics, but impacts > all the syntax elements that may have changed since Java 1.5, and make the > rules Java compiler fails when running in ServiceMix. > > As I said before, the workaround is quite easy, changing all the Java > code to be compliant with the compilation level. The question is just about > a confirmation of the Felix's class loader (org/apache/felix/framework/ > ModuleImpl$ModuleClassLoaderJava5) in the compiler's behavior, and a > better solution to be able to write RHS with a 'modern' syntax. > > Thanks. > > > 2014-05-20 16:56 GMT+02:00 Charles Moulliard [via Drools] <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029629&i=0> > >: > >> Is it a list that you would like to use as global param ? If this is the >> case, maybe change your rule & code like that >> >> //GET A KSESSION >> StatefulKnowledgeSession ksession = >> kbase.newStatefulKnowledgeSession(); >> >> //now create some test data >> ksession.insert( new Cheese( "stilton", >> 42 ) ); >> ksession.insert( new Person( "michael", >> "stilton", >> 42 ) ); >> final List<String> list = new ArrayList<String>(); >> ksession.setGlobal( "list", >> list ); >> >> ksession.fireAllRules(); >> >> System.out.println(list); >> >> ksession.dispose(); >> >> Rule >> >> template header >> age >> type >> log >> >> package org.drools.examples.templates; >> >> global java.util.List list; >> >> template "cheesefans" >> >> rule "Cheese fans_(a){row.rowNumber}&quot; >> when >> Person(age == @{age}) >> Cheese(type == "@{type}") >> then >> list.add("@{log}"); >> end >> end template >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Ephemeris Lappis <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=0> >> > wrote: >> >>> Hello. >>> >>> I have no such kind test with Pax Exam. Should you send me a simple >>> maven project example using a Karaf container ? >>> >>> Back to the problem, a very simple rule with something like that in the >>> RHS always fails when deployed in a bundle whose class loader is the felix >>> one : >>> >>> List<String> l = new ArrayList<>(); >>> that must be fixed with : >>> List<String> l = new ArrayList<String>(); >>> >>> or >>> >>> int n = 1_000; >>> that fails instead of : >>> int n = 1000; >>> >>> FYI, I use ServiceMix 4.5.3. >>> >>> Thanks again. >>> Regards. >>> >>> >>> >>> 2014-05-20 15:41 GMT+02:00 Charles Moulliard <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=1> >>> >: >>> >>> A test case will be required to reproduce your problem. Do you have a >>>> pax-exam test ? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Ephemeris Lappis <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=2> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello. >>>>> >>>>> Here is the first lines of the error message : >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 14:58:57,457 | ERROR | tp1946301910-151 | AbstractKieModule >>>>> | >>>>> 239 - org.drools.compiler - 6.1.0.20140429-1643 | Unable to build >>>>> KieBaseModel:MyKBase >>>>> Rule Compilation error : [Rule name='Main Rule'] >>>>> >>>>> my/tests/drools/osgi/expert/rules/Rule_Main_Rule1409557233.java (8:649) : >>>>> Incorrect number of arguments for type HashMap<K,V>; it cannot be >>>>> parameterized with arguments <?> >>>>> >>>>> my/tests/drools/osgi/expert/rules/Rule_Main_Rule1409557233.java (8:666) : >>>>> Syntax error on token "<", ? expected after this token >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have found the explanation and a workaround : put it all with a >>>>> strict >>>>> "1.5" syntax in the RHS ! In this current case, do not use <> to >>>>> infere the >>>>> generic type, but use the expected declared types instead. >>>>> >>>>> After a rather touchy remote debug of the ServiceMix runtime to >>>>> inspect what >>>>> is different from the Junit tests, I think that the problem comes >>>>> from the >>>>> classloader that is associated with the Kie container. Before >>>>> compilation >>>>> the language source and target level is set with version 1.7 as >>>>> expected, >>>>> but in the nameEnvironment that is passed to the JavaCompiler >>>>> (indeed, ecj >>>>> compiler), the droolsClassloader is of type >>>>> "org/apache/felix/framework/ModuleImpl$ModuleClassLoaderJava5". As >>>>> its name >>>>> seems to incidate, I'm afraid that the Karaf/Felix loader is >>>>> originally >>>>> built in 1.5. >>>>> >>>>> I've read some posts about the eclipse compiler that perhaps takes >>>>> into >>>>> account the caller compliance to adapt its compilation language level. >>>>> >>>>> Class loaders seem to be a serious problem when using Drools in >>>>> complex >>>>> environment such as a OSGi one... >>>>> >>>>> Please, could you confirm my analysis, and, if you have one, propose >>>>> any >>>>> better solution ? I don't know, for example, if it's possible to >>>>> influence >>>>> Karaf to use different levels of bundle class loaders... >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot. >>>>> >>>>> Regards. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: >>>>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-compilation-error-with-OSGi-integ... >>>>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rules-users mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=3> >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Charles Moulliard >>>> Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat >>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=4> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=5> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Charles Moulliard >> Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat >> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029628&i=6> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> ------------------------------ >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >> discussion below: >> >> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-compilation-error-with-OSGi-integ... >> To unsubscribe from Rules compilation error with OSGi integration >> (6.1.0.Beta3), click here. >> NAML<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=... >> > > > ------------------------------ > View this message in context: Re: [rules-users] Rules compilation error > with OSGi integration (6.1.0.Beta3)<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-compilation-error... > > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-User-forum-f47000.htm... Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users