10:23 p.m.
I'm creating a rule in which I'm comparing properties of two objects. All
works well I'm able to compare their properties and rule gets validated as
well and then I close the rule, but when I open the rule again properties of
second object in condition don't show up in guided editor however they are
present if I check the source of the guided rule.
Moreover it also doesn't allows me to use _id variable which is present in
my class whereas there is no issue if I use any other variable name id this
due to "_"?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
10:31 p.m.
What version?
Have you tried 6.1.CR2 there were lots of improvements in this area.
The issue is guided rules are stored as DRL and we need to reverse engineer
the model used by the UI from the DRL.
Failing that we'll need your DRL so we can fix whatever issue exists in
your scenario.
Thanks
Sent on the move
On 11 Jul 2014 21:27, "Sumit Dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm creating a rule in which I'm comparing properties of two
objects. All
works well I'm able to compare their properties and rule gets validated as
well and then I close the rule, but when I open the rule again properties
of
second object in condition don't show up in guided editor however they are
present if I check the source of the guided rule.
Moreover it also doesn't allows me to use _id variable which is present in
my class whereas there is no issue if I use any other variable name id this
due to "_"?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
10:43 p.m.
Thanks Mike I'll try with 6.1 and if issue still comes I'll share the drl.
Can you please also confirm if I can use variables whose names start with
"_" cause it seems it doesn't allows me to use _id
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
What version?
Have you tried 6.1.CR2 there were lots of improvements in this area.
The issue is guided rules are stored as DRL and we need to reverse
engineer the model used by the UI from the DRL.
Failing that we'll need your DRL so we can fix whatever issue exists in
your scenario.
Thanks
Sent on the move
On 11 Jul 2014 21:27, "Sumit Dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm creating a rule in which I'm comparing properties of two objects. All
> works well I'm able to compare their properties and rule gets validated as
> well and then I close the rule, but when I open the rule again properties
> of
> second object in condition don't show up in guided editor however they are
> present if I check the source of the guided rule.
> Moreover it also doesn't allows me to use _id variable which is present in
> my class whereas there is no issue if I use any other variable name id
> this
> due to "_"?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
11 p.m.
When you say "it doesn't allow me to use" can you be a little more
descriptive? Does the UI prevent it (I am thinking this is the case) or
does the DRL generate errors?
Sent on the move
On 11 Jul 2014 21:44, "sumit dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Mike I'll try with 6.1 and if issue still comes I'll
share the drl.
Can you please also confirm if I can use variables whose names start with
"_" cause it seems it doesn't allows me to use _id
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> What version?
>
> Have you tried 6.1.CR2 there were lots of improvements in this area.
>
> The issue is guided rules are stored as DRL and we need to reverse
> engineer the model used by the UI from the DRL.
>
> Failing that we'll need your DRL so we can fix whatever issue exists in
> your scenario.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sent on the move
> On 11 Jul 2014 21:27, "Sumit Dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> I'm creating a rule in which I'm comparing properties of two objects.
All
>> works well I'm able to compare their properties and rule gets validated
>> as
>> well and then I close the rule, but when I open the rule again
>> properties of
>> second object in condition don't show up in guided editor however they
>> are
>> present if I check the source of the guided rule.
>> Moreover it also doesn't allows me to use _id variable which is present
>> in
>> my class whereas there is no issue if I use any other variable name id
>> this
>> due to "_"?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
11:12 p.m.
I can create rule by selecting the field from fields dropdown but when I
try to validate it throws error given below :-
2014-07-12 02:36:24,203 [http-bio-8080-exec-3] ERROR Unable to build
KieBaseMode
l:defaultKieBase
Unable to Analyse Expression _id == $searchContext.lastThreeProducerId:
[Error: no such identifier: _id]
[Near : {... _id == $searchContext.lastThre ....}]
^ : [Rule name='EateryRepeatUsage']
data type of _id is string and same rule gets successfully validated if I
use any other variable of string type.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
When you say "it doesn't allow me to use" can you be a
little more
descriptive? Does the UI prevent it (I am thinking this is the case) or
does the DRL generate errors?
Sent on the move
On 11 Jul 2014 21:44, "sumit dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Mike I'll try with 6.1 and if issue still comes I'll share the drl.
>
> Can you please also confirm if I can use variables whose names start with
> "_" cause it seems it doesn't allows me to use _id
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> What version?
>>
>> Have you tried 6.1.CR2 there were lots of improvements in this area.
>>
>> The issue is guided rules are stored as DRL and we need to reverse
>> engineer the model used by the UI from the DRL.
>>
>> Failing that we'll need your DRL so we can fix whatever issue exists in
>> your scenario.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Sent on the move
>> On 11 Jul 2014 21:27, "Sumit Dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>>> I'm creating a rule in which I'm comparing properties of two
objects.
>>> All
>>> works well I'm able to compare their properties and rule gets validated
>>> as
>>> well and then I close the rule, but when I open the rule again
>>> properties of
>>> second object in condition don't show up in guided editor however they
>>> are
>>> present if I check the source of the guided rule.
>>> Moreover it also doesn't allows me to use _id variable which is present
>>> in
>>> my class whereas there is no issue if I use any other variable name id
>>> this
>>> due to "_"?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
>>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
11:21 p.m.
I don't have access to the code here, but it sounds like _ prefixes are
invalid, which means we have a potential bug.
Where/how did you manage to set _id binding?
Sent on the move
On 11 Jul 2014 22:13, "sumit dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I can create rule by selecting the field from fields dropdown but
when I
try to validate it throws error given below :-
2014-07-12 02:36:24,203 [http-bio-8080-exec-3] ERROR Unable to build
KieBaseMode
l:defaultKieBase
Unable to Analyse Expression _id == $searchContext.lastThreeProducerId:
[Error: no such identifier: _id]
[Near : {... _id == $searchContext.lastThre ....}]
^ : [Rule name='EateryRepeatUsage']
data type of _id is string and same rule gets successfully validated if I
use any other variable of string type.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> When you say "it doesn't allow me to use" can you be a little more
> descriptive? Does the UI prevent it (I am thinking this is the case) or
> does the DRL generate errors?
>
> Sent on the move
> On 11 Jul 2014 21:44, "sumit dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> Thanks Mike I'll try with 6.1 and if issue still comes I'll share the
>> drl.
>>
>> Can you please also confirm if I can use variables whose names start
>> with "_" cause it seems it doesn't allows me to use _id
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Michael Anstis <
>> michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What version?
>>>
>>> Have you tried 6.1.CR2 there were lots of improvements in this area.
>>>
>>> The issue is guided rules are stored as DRL and we need to reverse
>>> engineer the model used by the UI from the DRL.
>>>
>>> Failing that we'll need your DRL so we can fix whatever issue exists in
>>> your scenario.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Sent on the move
>>> On 11 Jul 2014 21:27, "Sumit Dhaniya"
<sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm creating a rule in which I'm comparing properties of two
objects.
>>>> All
>>>> works well I'm able to compare their properties and rule gets
>>>> validated as
>>>> well and then I close the rule, but when I open the rule again
>>>> properties of
>>>> second object in condition don't show up in guided editor however
they
>>>> are
>>>> present if I check the source of the guided rule.
>>>> Moreover it also doesn't allows me to use _id variable which is
>>>> present in
>>>> my class whereas there is no issue if I use any other variable name id
>>>> this
>>>> due to "_"?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
>>>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
8:39 a.m.
added a maven project as dependency in my project which contains mode pojo
-> Create a guided rule -> In config of guided rule add the class which
contains _id variable -> add a condition to the rule (the class object
which contains _id) -> apply restriction on the fields (_id will be listed
as one of the options to apply restriction on)
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I don't have access to the code here, but it sounds like _
prefixes are
invalid, which means we have a potential bug.
Where/how did you manage to set _id binding?
Sent on the move
On 11 Jul 2014 22:13, "sumit dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I can create rule by selecting the field from fields dropdown but when I
> try to validate it throws error given below :-
>
> 2014-07-12 02:36:24,203 [http-bio-8080-exec-3] ERROR Unable to build
> KieBaseMode
> l:defaultKieBase
> Unable to Analyse Expression _id == $searchContext.lastThreeProducerId:
> [Error: no such identifier: _id]
> [Near : {... _id == $searchContext.lastThre ....}]
> ^ : [Rule name='EateryRepeatUsage']
>
> data type of _id is string and same rule gets successfully validated if I
> use any other variable of string type.
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> When you say "it doesn't allow me to use" can you be a little more
>> descriptive? Does the UI prevent it (I am thinking this is the case) or
>> does the DRL generate errors?
>>
>> Sent on the move
>> On 11 Jul 2014 21:44, "sumit dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Mike I'll try with 6.1 and if issue still comes I'll share
the
>>> drl.
>>>
>>> Can you please also confirm if I can use variables whose names start
>>> with "_" cause it seems it doesn't allows me to use _id
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Michael Anstis <
>>> michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What version?
>>>>
>>>> Have you tried 6.1.CR2 there were lots of improvements in this area.
>>>>
>>>> The issue is guided rules are stored as DRL and we need to reverse
>>>> engineer the model used by the UI from the DRL.
>>>>
>>>> Failing that we'll need your DRL so we can fix whatever issue exists
>>>> in your scenario.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Sent on the move
>>>> On 11 Jul 2014 21:27, "Sumit Dhaniya"
<sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm creating a rule in which I'm comparing properties of two
objects.
>>>>> All
>>>>> works well I'm able to compare their properties and rule gets
>>>>> validated as
>>>>> well and then I close the rule, but when I open the rule again
>>>>> properties of
>>>>> second object in condition don't show up in guided editor
however
>>>>> they are
>>>>> present if I check the source of the guided rule.
>>>>> Moreover it also doesn't allows me to use _id variable which is
>>>>> present in
>>>>> my class whereas there is no issue if I use any other variable name
>>>>> id this
>>>>> due to "_"?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
>>>>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
8:40 a.m.
Hi Michael can you confirm the download link for 6.1.CR2
http://downloads.jboss.org/drools/release/snapshot/6.1.x/kie-drools-wb-6....
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:09 PM, sumit dhaniya <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
added a maven project as dependency in my project which contains mode
pojo
-> Create a guided rule -> In config of guided rule add the class which
contains _id variable -> add a condition to the rule (the class object
which contains _id) -> apply restriction on the fields (_id will be listed
as one of the options to apply restriction on)
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> I don't have access to the code here, but it sounds like _ prefixes are
> invalid, which means we have a potential bug.
>
> Where/how did you manage to set _id binding?
>
> Sent on the move
> On 11 Jul 2014 22:13, "sumit dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> I can create rule by selecting the field from fields dropdown but when I
>> try to validate it throws error given below :-
>>
>> 2014-07-12 02:36:24,203 [http-bio-8080-exec-3] ERROR Unable to build
>> KieBaseMode
>> l:defaultKieBase
>> Unable to Analyse Expression _id == $searchContext.lastThreeProducerId:
>> [Error: no such identifier: _id]
>> [Near : {... _id == $searchContext.lastThre ....}]
>> ^ : [Rule name='EateryRepeatUsage']
>>
>> data type of _id is string and same rule gets successfully validated if
>> I use any other variable of string type.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Michael Anstis <
>> michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> When you say "it doesn't allow me to use" can you be a little
more
>>> descriptive? Does the UI prevent it (I am thinking this is the case) or
>>> does the DRL generate errors?
>>>
>>> Sent on the move
>>> On 11 Jul 2014 21:44, "sumit dhaniya"
<sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Mike I'll try with 6.1 and if issue still comes I'll share
the
>>>> drl.
>>>>
>>>> Can you please also confirm if I can use variables whose names start
>>>> with "_" cause it seems it doesn't allows me to use _id
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Michael Anstis <
>>>> michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What version?
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you tried 6.1.CR2 there were lots of improvements in this area.
>>>>>
>>>>> The issue is guided rules are stored as DRL and we need to reverse
>>>>> engineer the model used by the UI from the DRL.
>>>>>
>>>>> Failing that we'll need your DRL so we can fix whatever issue
exists
>>>>> in your scenario.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent on the move
>>>>> On 11 Jul 2014 21:27, "Sumit Dhaniya"
<sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm creating a rule in which I'm comparing properties of
two
>>>>>> objects. All
>>>>>> works well I'm able to compare their properties and rule
gets
>>>>>> validated as
>>>>>> well and then I close the rule, but when I open the rule again
>>>>>> properties of
>>>>>> second object in condition don't show up in guided editor
however
>>>>>> they are
>>>>>> present if I check the source of the guided rule.
>>>>>> Moreover it also doesn't allows me to use _id variable which
is
>>>>>> present in
>>>>>> my class whereas there is no issue if I use any other variable
name
>>>>>> id this
>>>>>> due to "_"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
>>>>>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
10:05 a.m.
Hi,
This seems more a problem of the drools compiler. I'll try to reproduce it
and check what happens. Just one more question: is the field public or is it
accessed through a getter method in your Java class? In case you're using a
getter did you named it get_id or get_Id ?
Thanks,
Mario
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
10:24 a.m.
field is private and below are getter and setter :-
private String _id;
public String get_id() {
return _id;
}
public void set_id(String _id) {
this._id = _id;
}
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Mario Fusco <mario.fusco(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
This seems more a problem of the drools compiler. I'll try to reproduce it
and check what happens. Just one more question: is the field public or is
it
accessed through a getter method in your Java class? In case you're using a
getter did you named it get_id or get_Id ?
Thanks,
Mario
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
10:27 a.m.
Can you please provide me the link to download 6.1.CR2 tomcat war
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 1:54 PM, sumit dhaniya <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
field is private and below are getter and setter :-
private String _id;
public String get_id() {
return _id;
}
public void set_id(String _id) {
this._id = _id;
}
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Mario Fusco <mario.fusco(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This seems more a problem of the drools compiler. I'll try to reproduce it
> and check what happens. Just one more question: is the field public or is
> it
> accessed through a getter method in your Java class? In case you're using
> a
> getter did you named it get_id or get_Id ?
>
> Thanks,
> Mario
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
11:53 a.m.
I create the rule by comparing properties of two objects as shown in image
attached. Till I don't close the window generated source looks fine but when
I open this rule after closing it.
But when I open the rule next time it removes the highlighted condition from
the rule and also removes them from drl. Just wondering is there anything
I'm doing wrong or issue is something else.
<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4030322/rule_snapshot.png>
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
12:10 p.m.
Asking (at least) three questions at the same time on the same thread is
really going to annoy people.
It's the weekend; most people are not working and you are not paying for
our support.
When I am at my computer on Monday I will be happy to answer more. For now;
please provide the DRL for the rule that does not reopen correctly and your
object model.
Sent on the move
On 12 Jul 2014 10:54, "Sumit Dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I create the rule by comparing properties of two objects as shown in
image
attached. Till I don't close the window generated source looks fine but
when
I open this rule after closing it.
But when I open the rule next time it removes the highlighted condition
from
the rule and also removes them from drl. Just wondering is there anything
I'm doing wrong or issue is something else.
<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4030322/rule_snapshot.png>
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
1:17 p.m.
Michael I really appreciate all the help from the forum and the time
invested by the people to answer the queries.
I'm working as a freelance developer so if support is something affordable
then please let me know.
DRL :-
2.|3.|import java.lang.Number;4.|import
com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.SearchContext;5.|import
com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.ProducerMasterForRules;6.|import
com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.RuleFactor;7.|8.|rule
"SecondaryCuisineRepeatUsage"9.| dialect "mvel"10.| when11.|
$searchContext
: SearchContext( lastThreeCuisines != null )12.| ProducerMasterForRules(
primaryCuisine != null , primaryCuisine != $searchContext.lastThreeCuisines
, secondaryCuisine != null , secondaryCuisine ==
$searchContext.lastThreeCuisines )13.|
$secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor
: RuleFactor( )14.| then15.|
$secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor.setWeightageImpact(
-30 );16.| update( $secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor );17.|end
object models are attached.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Asking (at least) three questions at the same time on the same thread
is
really going to annoy people.
It's the weekend; most people are not working and you are not paying for
our support.
When I am at my computer on Monday I will be happy to answer more. For
now; please provide the DRL for the rule that does not reopen correctly and
your object model.
Sent on the move
On 12 Jul 2014 10:54, "Sumit Dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I create the rule by comparing properties of two objects as shown in image
> attached. Till I don't close the window generated source looks fine but
> when
> I open this rule after closing it.
> But when I open the rule next time it removes the highlighted condition
> from
> the rule and also removes them from drl. Just wondering is there anything
> I'm doing wrong or issue is something else.
> <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4030322/rule_snapshot.png>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
2:39 p.m.
Hello,
Class "ProducerMasterForRules" isn't valid; it references
"getPCuisines()"
that isn't in the class.
Since your rule uses the affected public methods "getPrimaryCuisine()" and
"getSecondaryCuisine()" can you provide the missing implementation?
I could mock something up, but want to be sure to use exactly what you are.
With kind regards,
Mike
On 12 July 2014 12:17, sumit dhaniya <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Michael I really appreciate all the help from the forum and the time
invested by the people to answer the queries.
I'm working as a freelance developer so if support is something affordable
then please let me know.
DRL :-
2.| 3.|import java.lang.Number;4. |import
com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.SearchContext;5.| import
com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.ProducerMasterForRules;6.|import
com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.RuleFactor; 7.|8.|rule
"SecondaryCuisineRepeatUsage" 9.| dialect "mvel"10. | when11.|
$searchContext
: SearchContext( lastThreeCuisines != null ) 12.| ProducerMasterForRules(
primaryCuisine != null , primaryCuisine !=
$searchContext.lastThreeCuisines , secondaryCuisine != null ,
secondaryCuisine == $searchContext.lastThreeCuisines ) 13.|
$secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor
: RuleFactor( )14.| then15.|
$secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor.setWeightageImpact(
-30 ); 16.| update( $secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor );17.| end
object models are attached.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Asking (at least) three questions at the same time on the same thread is
> really going to annoy people.
>
> It's the weekend; most people are not working and you are not paying for
> our support.
>
> When I am at my computer on Monday I will be happy to answer more. For
> now; please provide the DRL for the rule that does not reopen correctly and
> your object model.
>
> Sent on the move
> On 12 Jul 2014 10:54, "Sumit Dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> I create the rule by comparing properties of two objects as shown in
>> image
>> attached. Till I don't close the window generated source looks fine but
>> when
>> I open this rule after closing it.
>> But when I open the rule next time it removes the highlighted condition
>> from
>> the rule and also removes them from drl. Just wondering is there anything
>> I'm doing wrong or issue is something else.
>> <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4030322/rule_snapshot.png>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
2:54 p.m.
Hello,
I wrote a test that checks the marshalling of the DRL and it passes OK.
It could be that the workbench is failing fast midway through trying to
marshal due to the MVEL issue Mario mentions (the test doesn't pro
grammatically build meta-data from the classes in the model; whereas the
workbench does).
Can you re-try with alterations to your public getters/setters names (getId
instead of get_id)?
Thanks,
Mike
On 14 July 2014 13:39, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Class "ProducerMasterForRules" isn't valid; it references
"getPCuisines()"
that isn't in the class.
Since your rule uses the affected public methods "getPrimaryCuisine()" and
"getSecondaryCuisine()" can you provide the missing implementation?
I could mock something up, but want to be sure to use exactly what you are.
With kind regards,
Mike
On 12 July 2014 12:17, sumit dhaniya <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Michael I really appreciate all the help from the forum and the time
> invested by the people to answer the queries.
> I'm working as a freelance developer so if support is something
> affordable then please let me know.
>
>
>
> DRL :-
>
>
>
> 2.| 3.|import java.lang.Number;4. |import
> com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.SearchContext;5.| import
> com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.ProducerMasterForRules;6.|import
> com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.RuleFactor; 7.|8.|rule
> "SecondaryCuisineRepeatUsage" 9.| dialect "mvel"10. |
when11.| $searchContext
> : SearchContext( lastThreeCuisines != null ) 12.| ProducerMasterForRules(
> primaryCuisine != null , primaryCuisine !=
> $searchContext.lastThreeCuisines , secondaryCuisine != null ,
> secondaryCuisine == $searchContext.lastThreeCuisines ) 13.|
$secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor
> : RuleFactor( )14. | then15.|
$secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor.setWeightageImpact(
> -30 ); 16.| update( $secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor );17.| end
>
> object models are attached.
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Asking (at least) three questions at the same time on the same thread is
>> really going to annoy people.
>>
>> It's the weekend; most people are not working and you are not paying for
>> our support.
>>
>> When I am at my computer on Monday I will be happy to answer more. For
>> now; please provide the DRL for the rule that does not reopen correctly and
>> your object model.
>>
>> Sent on the move
>> On 12 Jul 2014 10:54, "Sumit Dhaniya" <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>>> I create the rule by comparing properties of two objects as shown in
>>> image
>>> attached. Till I don't close the window generated source looks fine but
>>> when
>>> I open this rule after closing it.
>>> But when I open the rule next time it removes the highlighted condition
>>> from
>>> the rule and also removes them from drl. Just wondering is there
>>> anything
>>> I'm doing wrong or issue is something else.
>>> <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4030322/rule_snapshot.png>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
>>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
2:56 p.m.
FYI, test http://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/commit/ee232266c
On 14 July 2014 13:54, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I wrote a test that checks the marshalling of the DRL and it passes OK.
It could be that the workbench is failing fast midway through trying to
marshal due to the MVEL issue Mario mentions (the test doesn't pro
grammatically build meta-data from the classes in the model; whereas the
workbench does).
Can you re-try with alterations to your public getters/setters names
(getId instead of get_id)?
Thanks,
Mike
On 14 July 2014 13:39, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Class "ProducerMasterForRules" isn't valid; it references
> "getPCuisines()" that isn't in the class.
>
> Since your rule uses the affected public methods "getPrimaryCuisine()"
> and "getSecondaryCuisine()" can you provide the missing implementation?
>
> I could mock something up, but want to be sure to use exactly what you
> are.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 12 July 2014 12:17, sumit dhaniya <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Michael I really appreciate all the help from the forum and the time
>> invested by the people to answer the queries.
>> I'm working as a freelance developer so if support is something
>> affordable then please let me know.
>>
>>
>>
>> DRL :-
>>
>>
>>
>> 2.| 3.|import java.lang.Number;4. |import
>> com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.SearchContext;5.| import
>> com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.ProducerMasterForRules;6.|import
>> com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.RuleFactor; 7.|8.|rule
>> "SecondaryCuisineRepeatUsage" 9.| dialect "mvel"10. |
when11.| $searchContext
>> : SearchContext( lastThreeCuisines != null ) 12.| ProducerMasterForRules(
>> primaryCuisine != null , primaryCuisine !=
>> $searchContext.lastThreeCuisines , secondaryCuisine != null ,
>> secondaryCuisine == $searchContext.lastThreeCuisines ) 13.|
$secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor
>> : RuleFactor( )14. | then15.|
$secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor.setWeightageImpact(
>> -30 ); 16.| update( $secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor );17.| end
>>
>> object models are attached.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Michael Anstis <
>> michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Asking (at least) three questions at the same time on the same thread
>>> is really going to annoy people.
>>>
>>> It's the weekend; most people are not working and you are not paying
>>> for our support.
>>>
>>> When I am at my computer on Monday I will be happy to answer more. For
>>> now; please provide the DRL for the rule that does not reopen correctly and
>>> your object model.
>>>
>>> Sent on the move
>>> On 12 Jul 2014 10:54, "Sumit Dhaniya"
<sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I create the rule by comparing properties of two objects as shown in
>>>> image
>>>> attached. Till I don't close the window generated source looks fine
>>>> but when
>>>> I open this rule after closing it.
>>>> But when I open the rule next time it removes the highlighted
>>>> condition from
>>>> the rule and also removes them from drl. Just wondering is there
>>>> anything
>>>> I'm doing wrong or issue is something else.
>>>>
<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4030322/rule_snapshot.png>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
>>>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
9:19 p.m.
Upgraded to 6.1CR2 it's fixed now.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
FYI, test http://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/commit/ee232266c
On 14 July 2014 13:54, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wrote a test that checks the marshalling of the DRL and it passes OK.
>
> It could be that the workbench is failing fast midway through trying to
> marshal due to the MVEL issue Mario mentions (the test doesn't pro
> grammatically build meta-data from the classes in the model; whereas the
> workbench does).
>
> Can you re-try with alterations to your public getters/setters names
> (getId instead of get_id)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 14 July 2014 13:39, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Class "ProducerMasterForRules" isn't valid; it references
>> "getPCuisines()" that isn't in the class.
>>
>> Since your rule uses the affected public methods "getPrimaryCuisine()"
>> and "getSecondaryCuisine()" can you provide the missing
implementation?
>>
>> I could mock something up, but want to be sure to use exactly what you
>> are.
>>
>> With kind regards,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On 12 July 2014 12:17, sumit dhaniya <sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Michael I really appreciate all the help from the forum and the time
>>> invested by the people to answer the queries.
>>> I'm working as a freelance developer so if support is something
>>> affordable then please let me know.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> DRL :-
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2.| 3.|import java.lang.Number;4. |import
>>> com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.SearchContext;5.| import
>>> com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.ProducerMasterForRules;6.|import
>>> com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.RuleFactor; 7.|8.|rule
>>> "SecondaryCuisineRepeatUsage" 9.| dialect "mvel"10. |
when11.| $searchContext
>>> : SearchContext( lastThreeCuisines != null ) 12.|
ProducerMasterForRules(
>>> primaryCuisine != null , primaryCuisine !=
>>> $searchContext.lastThreeCuisines , secondaryCuisine != null ,
>>> secondaryCuisine == $searchContext.lastThreeCuisines ) 13.|
$secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor
>>> : RuleFactor( )14. | then15.|
$secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor.setWeightageImpact(
>>> -30 ); 16.| update( $secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor );17.|
>>> end
>>>
>>> object models are attached.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Michael Anstis <
>>> michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Asking (at least) three questions at the same time on the same thread
>>>> is really going to annoy people.
>>>>
>>>> It's the weekend; most people are not working and you are not paying
>>>> for our support.
>>>>
>>>> When I am at my computer on Monday I will be happy to answer more. For
>>>> now; please provide the DRL for the rule that does not reopen correctly
and
>>>> your object model.
>>>>
>>>> Sent on the move
>>>> On 12 Jul 2014 10:54, "Sumit Dhaniya"
<sumitdhaniya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I create the rule by comparing properties of two objects as shown in
>>>>> image
>>>>> attached. Till I don't close the window generated source looks
fine
>>>>> but when
>>>>> I open this rule after closing it.
>>>>> But when I open the rule next time it removes the highlighted
>>>>> condition from
>>>>> the rule and also removes them from drl. Just wondering is there
>>>>> anything
>>>>> I'm doing wrong or issue is something else.
>>>>>
<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4030322/rule_snapshot.png>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
>>>>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
11:26 a.m.
Thanks for your clarifications.
The problem was in mvel. I reproduced and fixed it (
https://github.com/mvel/mvel/commit/874b03a8c5700661b503d96ad5d2ce1397cde18a
). The fix will be available when we will drop another mvel release and
integrate it. For now I can only confirm that field names starting with an
underscore cannot work with the current release.
Thanks again and regards,
Mario
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
3573
days inactive
3576
days old
18 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Mario Fusco -
Michael Anstis -
Sumit Dhaniya -
sumit dhaniya