10:48 a.m.
Hi,
We are using Jboss-rules 3.0.5 and I have written a simple rule:
rule "Valid Format"
when
$status : RuleResult()
$id : Identifier()
eval ($id.getValue() != null)
eval (!$id.getValue().matches("^([0-9]{9})$"))
then
$status.addErrorMessage("Identifier does not match
required format");
end
In my unit test, I create an instance of the Identifier object and do
not set the Value, therefore it is null by default. I have an earlier
rule that checks for this null value and places an error message in the
result object appropriately. I would expect this error to fail and not
see this error message in the result, but instead see the missing value
error message. The problem is that I see both.
It appears as though the eval null check is failing. Am I
misunderstanding how this rule should work?
Any insight and/or answers are really appreciated.
Thanks,
John
11:02 a.m.
New subject: Season greetings
Hi Drools Team,
Just an quick email to wish you all a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
(with a "religion, if and where, permitting" caveat).
I hope you don't drink too much over the festive period (again, "religion,
if and where, permitting") ;-)
Cheers,
Mike
11:19 a.m.
How about this:
rule "Valid Format"
when
$status : RuleResult()
Identifier(value matches "^([0-9]{9})$")
then
$status.addErrorMessage("Identifier does not match required format");
end
http://downloads.jboss.com/drools/docs/4.0.3.15993.GA/html_single/index.h...
On Dec 19, 2007 9:48 AM, <John.Dubchak(a)wellsfargo.com> wrote:
Hi,
We are using Jboss-rules 3.0.5 and I have written a simple rule:
rule "Valid Format"
when
$status : RuleResult()
$id : Identifier()
eval ($id.getValue() != null)
eval (!$id.getValue().matches("^([0-9]{9})$"))
then
$status.addErrorMessage("Identifier does not match required
format");
end
In my unit test, I create an instance of the Identifier object and do not
set the Value, therefore it is null by default. I have an earlier rule that
checks for this null value and places an error message in the result object
appropriately. I would expect this error to fail and not see this error
message in the result, but instead see the missing value error message. The
problem is that I see both.
It appears as though the eval null check is failing. Am I misunderstanding
how this rule should work?
Any insight and/or answers are really appreciated.
Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
11:20 a.m.
although it looks like you may want "not matches" instead?
On Dec 19, 2007 10:19 AM, Andrew Robinson <andrew.rw.robinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
How about this:
rule "Valid Format"
when
$status : RuleResult()
Identifier(value matches "^([0-9]{9})$")
then
$status.addErrorMessage("Identifier does not match required format");
end
http://downloads.jboss.com/drools/docs/4.0.3.15993.GA/html_single/index.h...
On Dec 19, 2007 9:48 AM, <John.Dubchak(a)wellsfargo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are using Jboss-rules 3.0.5 and I have written a simple rule:
>
>
>
> rule "Valid Format"
>
>
>
> when
>
> $status : RuleResult()
>
> $id : Identifier()
>
>
>
> eval ($id.getValue() != null)
>
> eval (!$id.getValue().matches("^([0-9]{9})$"))
>
> then
>
> $status.addErrorMessage("Identifier does not match required
> format");
>
>
>
> end
>
>
>
> In my unit test, I create an instance of the Identifier object and do not
> set the Value, therefore it is null by default. I have an earlier rule that
> checks for this null value and places an error message in the result object
> appropriately. I would expect this error to fail and not see this error
> message in the result, but instead see the missing value error message. The
> problem is that I see both.
>
>
>
> It appears as though the eval null check is failing. Am I misunderstanding
> how this rule should work?
>
>
>
> Any insight and/or answers are really appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
1:22 p.m.
Yes, thanks for the reply. I managed to correct the issue - my test
suite was picking up an older test file on my classpath. (Yep, user
error)
John
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Andrew
Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 11:20 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Help with my understanding
although it looks like you may want "not matches" instead?
On Dec 19, 2007 10:19 AM, Andrew Robinson <andrew.rw.robinson(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
How about this:
rule "Valid Format"
when
$status : RuleResult()
Identifier(value matches "^([0-9]{9})$")
then
$status.addErrorMessage("Identifier does not match required
format");
end
http://downloads.jboss.com/drools/docs/4.0.3.15993.GA/html_single/index.
html#d0e3318
On Dec 19, 2007 9:48 AM, <John.Dubchak(a)wellsfargo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are using Jboss-rules 3.0.5 and I have written a simple rule:
>
>
>
> rule "Valid Format"
>
>
>
> when
>
> $status : RuleResult()
>
> $id : Identifier()
>
>
>
> eval ($id.getValue() != null)
>
> eval (!$id.getValue().matches("^([0-9]{9})$"))
>
> then
>
> $status.addErrorMessage("Identifier does not match
required
> format");
>
>
>
> end
>
>
>
> In my unit test, I create an instance of the Identifier object and
do not
> set the Value, therefore it is null by default. I have an
earlier
rule that
> checks for this null value and places an error message in the
result
object
> appropriately. I would expect this error to fail and not see
this
error
> message in the result, but instead see the missing value error
message. The
> problem is that I see both.
>
>
>
> It appears as though the eval null check is failing. Am I
misunderstanding
> how this rule should work?
>
>
>
> Any insight and/or answers are really appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
5973
days inactive
5973
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Andrew Robinson -
Anstis, Michael (M.) -
John.Dubchak＠wellsfargo.com