Hi, I'm getting stuck on this and I'm hoping someone can help.. I need to be able to check that a collection contains one, and only one item from another collection. Ideally, I would do something like this: a:Answer(responses contains one of ("a","b","c")); Is there a way do do this without resorting to evals or predicate expressions? (drools 4.07) Thanks, Dave -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-check-if-a-collection-contains-one%2C-and-onl... Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Thanks for your response. I don't think contains will work in this case. I need to match if a collection contains one, and only one, of another collection. So " ('a','b','c') contains one of ('a','b','e') " should not match, where "('a','b','c') contains ('a','2','3')" should match. Thanks, Dave Cracauer On Aug 23, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Scott Burrows wrote: You have the answer in your example, reserved word "contains" will give you that information. Scott Burrows On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, David Cracauer <dcracauer(a)earthlink.net&gt;wrote: > > Hi, > I'm getting stuck on this and I'm hoping someone can help.. > I need to be able to check that a collection contains one, and only one > item > from another collection. > > Ideally, I would do something like this: > > a:Answer(responses contains one of ("a","b","c")); > > Is there a way do do this without resorting to evals or predicate > expressions? (drools 4.07) > > Thanks, > Dave > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-check-if-a-collection-contains-one%2C-and-onl... > Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Hi All, I've been playing with BRMS (4.x) for some time & found it very interesting & useful. Wondering if the BRMS system has (or if there's plan in 5.x) testing infrastructure for rules. Before I actually create a snapshot (and make the rules available to the clients), it would be nice to have a "playground" where I can simulate some of the scenarios & validate if the rule-contents are getting executed the way i want them to be. Given that the rule definitions are actually parsed by the system (drl file grammar), it should be possible to automatically generate test cases that can walk through different blocks in the rule definition. Also, generation of test data should not be tough. Thanks, -ram _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Adhikari, Ram wrote: Hi All, I've been playing with BRMS (4.x) for some time & found it very interesting & useful. Wondering if the BRMS system has (or if there's plan in 5.x) testing infrastructure for rules. Before I actually create a snapshot (and make the rules available to the clients), it would be nice to have a "playground" where I can simulate some of the scenarios & validate if the rule-contents are getting executed the way i want them to be. Given that the rule definitions are actually parsed by the system (drl file grammar), it should be possible to automatically generate test cases that can walk through different blocks in the rule definition. Also, generation of test data should not be tough. Drools 5.0 has some capabilities for this. There is also a excel spreadsheet testing app that Qantas donated, but this won't make 5.0 as it needs someone to take the time to clean it up - any takers? https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1685 Thanks, -ram ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Michal Bali wrote: Hi, What license does this 'Spreadsheet based scenario test tool' have? Is it ASL ver. 2? or GPL? Fit For Rules is GPL, as it's not one of our projects. The jira below donated by Qantas is ASL. Mark Best Regards, Michal On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt;wrote: > Adhikari, Ram wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've been playing with BRMS (4.x) for some time & found it > very interesting & useful. Wondering if the BRMS system has (or if there's > plan in 5.x) testing infrastructure for rules. Before I actually create a > snapshot (and make the rules available to the clients), it would be nice to > have a "playground" where I can simulate some of the scenarios & validate if > the rule-contents are getting executed the way i want them to be. Given > that the rule definitions are actually parsed by the system (drl file > grammar), it should be possible to automatically generate test cases that > can walk through different blocks in the rule definition. Also, generation > of test data should not be tough. > > Drools 5.0 has some capabilities for this. There is also a excel > spreadsheet testing app that Qantas donated, but this won't make 5.0 as it > needs someone to take the time to clean it up - any takers? > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1685 > > > > Thanks, > > -ram > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users