Hi Wolfgang,
Please take a look at attached new example.
This time the example can demonstrate when strict mode is false we don't have to put
class cast.
Beside I finally figured out how to switch strict mode for MVEL dialect.
Best regards,
Vladimir
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:36:10 +0200
From: wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-users] unable to resolve method using strict-mode
The Java code in the archive just compiles a .drl file, and there's no reason this
should fail. The class cast would only appear to be missing after a Map object is inserted
into WM, and the session is run so that the rule fires.
-W
2009/10/2 Vladimir Perlov <vladperl(a)hotmail.com>
It's compiled and working on Windows without any casting :)
Check out the test project I attached.
You will see that the rule will compile from web application (Windows only) or with Java
SE application. The web application using JSF so in case to run it use application server
with included JSF library.
http://download.java.net/glassfish/v3/promoted/
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:48:17 +0200
From: wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-users] unable to resolve method using strict-mode
Map() in the .drl file is bound to be interpreted as Map<Object,Object> so that a
Map.get() returns an Object. To be able to call method getSomeMethod() you'd have to
cast this result, according to
((SomeClass)$map.get("x")).getSomeMethod()
I fail to understand how this could ever be avoided - strict or no strict, MVEL or not
MVEL.
-W
2009/10/2 Vladimir Perlov <vladperl(a)hotmail.com>
Hi Wolfgang,
Thank you very much for quick response!
I tried your suggestion and still getting the following error:
Unable to build expression for 'consequence': Failed to compile: 1
compilation error(s): - (1,29) unable to resolve method using
strict-mode: java.lang.Object.getSomeMethod() '
System.out.println($map.get("x").getSomeMethod());
' : [Rule name='TEST']
At least now I have only 1 compilation error comparing to the previous variant.
modified rule:
rule "TEST"
dialect "mvel"
when
$map : Map()
then
System.out.println($map.get("x").getSomeMethod());
end
I believe that problem is related to strict-mode that somehow enforced on Linux but not on
Windows.
I tried to remove the strict mode using the the following approach but it seems don't
have any effect.
We have web application with many drools rules and it's working on Windows but when we
deployed the same application to Linux we are getting failed compile errors ;)
KnowledgeBuilderConfiguration config =
KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilderConfiguration();
config.setProperty("drools.dialect.mvel.strict", "false");
kbuilder = KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder(config);
Please advise me.
By the way I'm using drools 5.0.1
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:30:25 +0200
From: wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-users] unable to resolve method using strict-mode
2009/10/2 Vladimir Perlov <vladperl(a)hotmail.com>
Here is the rule that failed to compile on Linux:
rule "TEST"
dialect "mvel"
Send
when
map : Map()
$map : Map()
or omit '$' in the consequence.
-W
then
System.out.println($map.get("x").getSomeMethod());
end
Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits. Check it out.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/