Scott,
I can't comment on the impact, but Jozef Hartinger from Seam QE can
help you verify the change actually fixes the bug (he did already by a
manual edit) in the EAP branch.
Pete
On 4 Aug 2009, at 19:03, Scott Marlow wrote:
The change mentioned in JBPAPP-2365 has not yet been applied to
EAP5. I can do this but I need help in verifying that the change
will not cause any harm. I also need help in verifying that the
change causes some good. Could someone please explain what the
impact of the following change will be? Please add your response to
JBPAPP-2365 so others can see your answer.
The recommended change is to update conf/bootstrap/profile.xml from
(see two lines with "|" in first column):
<!-- This just checks metadata locations -->
<bean name="MetaDataStructureModificationChecker"
class
=
"org
.jboss
.deployers
.vfs.spi.structure.modified.MetaDataStructureModificationChecker">
<constructor>
<parameter><inject bean="MainDeployer" /></parameter>
</constructor>
<property name="cache"><inject bean="StructureModCache"
/></property>
| <property name="filter"><bean
class
=
"org.jboss.system.server.profile.basic.XmlIncludeVirtualFileFilter" /
></property>
</bean>
<!-- We just visit wars, but exclude classes, lib, dev dirs -->
<bean name="WebVisitorAttributes"
class
=
"org
.jboss.system.server.profile.basic.IncludeExcludeVisitorAttributes">
<constructor>
<parameter>
<set>
<value>.war</value>
</set>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<set>
<value>WEB-INF/classes</value>
<value>WEB-INF/lib</value>
| <value>WEB-INF/dev</value>
</set>
</parameter>
</constructor>
</bean>
To:
<!-- This just checks metadata locations -->
<bean name="MetaDataStructureModificationChecker"
class
=
"org
.jboss
.deployers
.vfs.spi.structure.modified.MetaDataStructureModificationChecker">
<constructor>
<parameter><inject bean="MainDeployer" /></parameter>
</constructor>
<property name="cache"><inject bean="StructureModCache"
/></property>
</bean>
<!-- We just visit wars, but exclude classes, lib, dev dirs -->
<bean name="WebVisitorAttributes"
class
=
"org
.jboss.system.server.profile.basic.IncludeExcludeVisitorAttributes">
<constructor>
<parameter>
<set>
<value>.war</value>
</set>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<set>
<value>WEB-INF/classes</value>
<value>WEB-INF/lib</value>
</set>
</parameter>
</constructor>
</bean>
Thanks,
Scott
On 08/04/2009 01:49 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
> See
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPAPP-2365 - Scott is onto
> it.
>
> On 4 Aug 2009, at 18:40, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
>> Okey - so I guess we need to get this raised as a gigantic red
>> flag somewhere towards AS5/EAP
>> since otherwise EAP 5 + JBDS outofbox won't have the
>> fastturnaround deployment :(
>>
>> /max
>>
>> Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>>>
>>> Pete Muir wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks like
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6722 which is
>>>> marked fix for 5.2.x
>>>>
>>>> But JIRA won't display that issue (I'm contacting
jboss.org
>>>> support).
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Jason, had opened a helpdesk ticket for this a long time back.
>>> Looks
>>> like it's still not resolved. Here's how you can see the contents
>>> (workaround)
>>>
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/si/jira.issueviews:issue-html/JBAS-6722/JBAS-...
>>>
>>>
>>> -Jaikiran
>>>
>>>> On 4 Aug 2009, at 15:46, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I don't see what JBAS-6782 has to do with hot deployment. I
>>>>> know we
>>>>> have previously had problems with hot deployment on JBoss AS 5,
>>>>> but
>>>>> the ones we saw were supposed to be fixed in AS 5.1
>>>>>
>>>>> The basic hot-deployment should be tested as part of Seam
>>>>> 2.2.0.GA
>>>>> release process. Norman, Ondrej, Jozef - did it get checked?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4 Aug 2009, at 15:28, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snjezana Peco píše v Út 04. 08. 2009 v 16:12 +0200:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have tried incremental hot deployment of Java components
as
>>>>>>> described
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>
http://docs.jboss.org/seam/2.2.0.GA/reference/en-US/html/gettingstarted.h...
>>>>>>> It works correctly with JBoss AS 4.2.3, but doesn't work
with
>>>>>>> JBoss
>>>>>>> AS 5.1.
>>>>>>> See
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-4585 for more
>>>>>>> details.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there any way to solve this issue?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> it doesn't work for now -
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/
>>>>>> JBAS-6782
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snjeza
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Marek Novotny
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> JBoss Seam Product Lead
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
>>>>>> Purkynova 99
>>>>>> 612 45 Brno
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Email: mnovotny(a)redhat.com
>>>>>> Office phone: +420 532 294 287, ext. 82-62 087
>>>>>> mobile: +420 608 509 230
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Looking to carve out IT costs?
>>>>>>
www.europe.redhat.com/promo/carveoutcosts/
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>
>