Re: [seam-dev] Porting package for Seam

Why do you need to do this? I can't see any reason for it. On 22 Apr 2009, at 02:18, Shane Bryzak wrote: > It seems that we need something like the webbeans porting package > but for Seam, since we need to be able to get a reference to the > current manager statically from non-bean classes. Any thoughts on > this Pete? > _______________________________________________ > seam-dev mailing list > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev -- Pete Muir http://www.seamframework.org http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete