John, George and Jordan,
I'm assuming that both the JMS and JCR modules will want to leverage the
transaction support for non-EJBs that is currently provided by Seam
Persistence, correct? Given that's the case, I proposed moving the
transaction APIs into the org.jboss.seam.transaction package. However, after
Seam 3.0 final, I'm thinking we should split this package into a transaction
module that can be shared. Does that sound like the right way to go?
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMPERSIST-34
Btw, you can use an @Unwraps method or proxy handler to enlist your resource
into the current transaction when the resource is dereferenced. See
https://github.com/seam/persistence/blob/master/impl/src/main/java/org/jb...
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction