Re: [seam-dev] laying the tracks for Seam 3
On 21 Apr 2009, at 22:17, Jay Balunas wrote:
> faces (which would have page actions, faces messages, and perhaps
> engulf the current ui too)
Sounds good. We should impl page actions on top of JSF2 events I
think. FacesMessages aren't needed as they are now stored in the
flashscope by default.
Pete - We had talked about having the ui component being separate
from seam core and not depend on it. This would allow application
to who are not using seam to take advantage of the ui component.
This came up a while back in a discussion about the RichFaces
validation components and moving them to seam-ui.
Would this current approach satisfy that?
Yes. As I keep saying "there is no Seam core" in Seam 3 - all modules
will *just* depend on any JSR-299 impl :-) But you are actually asking
"Can the faces module degrade gracefully such that what can be used in
a plain JSF2 environment - no 299 - works" I think?
--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete