> So I guess the real issue at hand is...the consistent packaging
of
interceptors is really about making the <interceptors> element as simple as
possible by making all the interceptors classes have the same number of
package segments. That need may or may not be contrived. I haven't stood in
the shoes of the developer yet being required to list out a bunch of
interceptor classes.
It sounds contrived to me. Where does it come from? Given that a user might
declare some interceptors, where does that leave them?
They can call interceptors whatever they want ;)
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"