Re: [seam-dev] Seam 2.1 issues in Tools

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen < max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: When I first began writing chapter 5 of Seam in Action and how Seam related component names to classes, I thought that Seam was using the package name of the class to assemble the component name and vice-versa. But as I got deeper into the research for that chapter, I discovered that this pattern just happens to be the naming convention for the built-in components (until 2.1). In the end, you have to go through the @Package annotation to be absolutely sure what the qualified component name is (or consider the shorthands that components.xml allows). It sounds like that you were already aware of that Max, but that the convention was good enough (the enemy of better) at the time. We should definitely have tools use the true mapping logic that Seam uses in the future. I would vote for it being important. -Dan -- Dan Allen Software consultant | Author of Seam in Action http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week, it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if you feel that it did not reach my attention.