Re: [seam-dev] Re: Seam/RESTEasy integration

Bill, agreed on all these things - JSF2 no longer overloads POST for GET (which it did previously), adds good support for statelessness and unique URIs for a resource through page actions. However I don't think full REST is possible in JSF (not overloading POST for PUT/ DELETE). On 4 Mar 2009, at 17:53, Bill Burke wrote: > Not sure, here's some guesses on what making JSF "RESTFul" means: > > * Unique URIs to each "page" > * don't overload the meaning of HTTP methods. i.e. don't change > state of server with a GET > * No sessions, stateless > > Or maybe people just want nice URI templating and JAX-RS injection > annotations. I don't know. Which isn't persay, "REST", but still > nice to have. These would also be nice and are on the cards for JSF 2.1... > > > Dan Allen wrote: >> I am working on Seam+RESTEasy integration as a part of my >> university >> thesis. I am focusing more on new features rather than bug >> fixing as >> this is more interesting for university however I was fixing some >> bugs as well. The plan is to implement following things: >> * REST API for application framework - I am working on a >> component that exposes CRUD API to manipulate database entities >> (using Seam's home and query components)- I have some working >> prototypes already, working on details now. >> * Exception mapping in pages.xml >> * Facelets XHTML mapping >> Furthermore, I am planning on creating a sample application >> demonstrating Seam+RESTEasy integration. It will be a simple todo >> app exposing REST API. >> Jozef, while you are thinking about how to expand this >> integration, could you record some thoughts about how JSF might >> leverage REST. One of the features that has been long requested of >> JSF is that it support REST. The problem is, we have to first >> figure out what that even means. Maybe it isn't even relevant. >> Either way, if there is a sensible integration, we (Red Hat) want >> to be the ones that figure it out and propose it to the JSF EG for >> JSF 2.1. >> It may well be that the JSF REST merely consists of defining >> mappings in the PDL (i.e., Facelets). >> If anyone else has any thoughts, feel free to share them. >> -Dan >> -- >> Dan Allen >> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action >> http://mojavelinux.com >> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction >> NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a >> daily >> basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away >> from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more >> than a week, >> it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message >> was >> caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a >> message if >> you feel that it did not reach my attention. > > -- > Bill Burke > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > http://bill.burkecentral.com > _______________________________________________ > seam-dev mailing list > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev -- Pete Muir http://www.seamframework.org http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev