On 29/11/09 02:48, Gavin King wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Shane
Bryzak<sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm pleased to say that Seam Remoting 3.0.0 is now compiling and works
> with the ported hello world example in CDI.
>
Cool :-)
> Since bean names are now an optional thing, I was wondering whether I
> should support remoting with non-named beans. I could probably do it by
> just allowing a fully qualified class name, what do you guys think?
>
It would be better to use a combination of bean type and qualifiers.
Almost got this working, however I need to be able to reflectively
create an AnnotationLiteral, given a String containing the fully
qualified name of the qualifier. Anyone done this before?