Re: [seam-dev] Issues with testing and emma
Hi john, aslak provided us an extension to integrate arquillian with jacoco.
https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-jacoco
we´ve been testing it and it´s working well.
Emma uses offline bytecode instrumentation, and this could be a really
hellish to analyzes coverage data over the container.
I believe that the best approach in our case (using arquillian) would be
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:19 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I just noticed this morning that emma reports very low code coverage
on my
code. However, when I switch the injection points from say "SomeBean" to
"SomeBeanImpl" then my code coverage sudden jumps up. I expect it to be
higher. It seems like Emma has some issues dealing with CDI proxies, or
possibly arquillian. Has anyone else noticed this?
John
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev