Re: [seam-dev] Naming convention and package organization advice

Are these beans that developers will be interacting with / API? Or are they an implementation detail? If the former. Why not just use "Twitter" or "Facebook" ? "Handler" isn't bad, I'm not sure there's a great word, what is the purpose of these beans. e.g: what do they do? that might help us figure out if the name is appropriate, or if we should try to forge a little more ;) ~Lincoln On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; wrote: Hi Team, in Seam social I created bean to deal with social network. I named those Bean with "Handler" suffix : i.e. TwitterHandler. I choose this over "Service" or "Controller" but as there will be other Seam module dealing with high level functional services, I prefer check this naming convention with you. Sharing the same naming convention across modules to have something homogenous is something important. Antoine SABOT-DURAND --------------------------------------- Twitter ; http://twitter.com/antoine_sd LinkedIn : http://fr.linkedin.com/in/antoinesabotdurand _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.com http://scrumshark.com "Keep it Simple"