Come on now ;) lol... On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > +1 > > ...but I have to give Emmanual props for SEAMIEIGHTEENN comment ;) When at > first you don't succeed, try to defeat the purpose ;) > > - Dan Allen > > Sent from my Android-powered phone: > An open platform for carriers, consumers > and developers. > > On Mar 16, 2010 10:57 AM, "Lincoln Baxter, III" <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > > SEAMINTL it is..... Any other ideas, preferences? No numbers?... > ridiculous. > > > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Rodney Russ <rruss(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > ----- "Dan Allen" <d... > > -- > Lincoln Baxter, III > http://ocpsoft.com > http://scrumshark.com > "Keep it Simple" > > -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.com http://scrumshark.com "Keep it Simple"

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III < lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Let's just stick with Ken's original SEAMINTL :) That's what the +1 was for. I was just joking around ;) -Dan -- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

It depends. What WEB type things are you thinking of? I think that other modules will be created for non-Faces functionality. Wicket, GWT, etc. On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > Will there be a SEAMWEB or does everything related go under SEAMFACES? > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III < >> lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Let's just stick with Ken's original SEAMINTL :) >> >> >> That's what the +1 was for. I was just joking around ;) >> >> -Dan >> >> -- >> Dan Allen >> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action >> Registered Linux User #231597 >> >> http://mojavelinux.com >> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction >> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen >> >> _______________________________________________ >> seam-dev mailing list >> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >> >> > > > -- > --- > Nik > -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.com http://scrumshark.com "Keep it Simple"

Huh. Well would ya look at that.... awesome. Looks like I'm your co-lead. Neat :) I think this should be a separate project... No reason to depend on Faces for Servlet functionality. It could go the other way around, though, in that the Faces module might depend on the Servlet module. I see no harm in that. WDYT? --Lincoln On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > For example the Servlet stuff from > http://seamframework.org/Documentation/Seam3Modules that we are > apparently leading ;-) > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III < > lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> It depends. What WEB type things are you thinking of? I think that other >> modules will be created for non-Faces functionality. Wicket, GWT, etc. >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >> >>> Will there be a SEAMWEB or does everything related go under SEAMFACES? >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III < >>>> lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> Let's just stick with Ken's original SEAMINTL :) >>>> >>>> >>>> That's what the +1 was for. I was just joking around ;) >>>> >>>> -Dan >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dan Allen >>>> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action >>>> Registered Linux User #231597 >>>> >>>> http://mojavelinux.com >>>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction >>>> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> seam-dev mailing list >>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> --- >>> Nik >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lincoln Baxter, III >> http://ocpsoft.com >> http://scrumshark.com >> "Keep it Simple" >> > > > > -- > --- > Nik > -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.com http://scrumshark.com "Keep it Simple"

SEAMSERVLET ? On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com <mailto:dan.j.allen@gmail.com>> wrote: When I spoke to Pete on the phone about this module, he felt that it should be labeled "servlet" and not "web". So SEAMSRVLT perhaps or SEAMHTTP. -Dan On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com <mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com>> wrote: Huh. Well would ya look at that.... awesome. Looks like I'm your co-lead. Neat :) I think this should be a separate project... No reason to depend on Faces for Servlet functionality. It could go the other way around, though, in that the Faces module might depend on the Servlet module. I see no harm in that. WDYT? --Lincoln On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com <mailto:nickarls@gmail.com>> wrote: For example the Servlet stuff from http://seamframework.org/Documentation/Seam3Modules that we are apparently leading ;-) On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com <mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com>> wrote: It depends. What WEB type things are you thinking of? I think that other modules will be created for non-Faces functionality. Wicket, GWT, etc. On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com <mailto:nickarls@gmail.com>> wrote: Will there be a SEAMWEB or does everything related go under SEAMFACES? On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com <mailto:dan.j.allen@gmail.com>> wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com <mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com>> wrote: Let's just stick with Ken's original SEAMINTL :) That's what the +1 was for. I was just joking around ;) -Dan -- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:seam-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev -- --- Nik -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.com http://scrumshark.com "Keep it Simple" -- --- Nik -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.com http://scrumshark.com "Keep it Simple" -- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.com http://scrumshark.com "Keep it Simple" _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

When I spoke to Pete on the phone about this module, he felt that it should be labeled "servlet" and not "web". So SEAMSRVLT perhaps or SEAMHTTP. -Dan On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Huh. Well would ya look at that.... awesome. Looks like I'm your co-lead. Neat :) I think this should be a separate project... No reason to depend on Faces for Servlet functionality. It could go the other way around, though, in that the Faces module might depend on the Servlet module. I see no harm in that. WDYT? --Lincoln On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: For example the Servlet stuff from http://seamframework.org/Documentation/Seam3Modules that we are apparently leading ;-) On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: It depends. What WEB type things are you thinking of? I think that other modules will be created for non-Faces functionality. Wicket, GWT, etc. On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Will there be a SEAMWEB or does everything related go under SEAMFACES? On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Let's just stick with Ken's original SEAMINTL :) That's what the +1 was for. I was just joking around ;) -Dan -- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev -- --- Nik -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.com http://scrumshark.com "Keep it Simple" -- --- Nik -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.com http://scrumshark.com "Keep it Simple" -- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

Sold. You can find it here: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SEAMINTL Let me know if you need administrator privileges on this. Enjoy, Rodney ----- "Lincoln Baxter, III" <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Let's just stick with Ken's original SEAMINTL :) > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III < > lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com > wrote: > > > Come on now ;) lol... > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Dan Allen < dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > ...but I have to give Emmanual props for SEAMIEIGHTEENN comment ;) > When at first you don't succeed, try to defeat the purpose ;) > > > - Dan Allen > > Sent from my Android-powered phone: > An open platform for carriers, consumers > and developers. > > > > > On Mar 16, 2010 10:57 AM, "Lincoln Baxter, III" < > lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com > wrote: > > SEAMINTL it is..... Any other ideas, preferences? No numbers?... > ridiculous. > > > > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Rodney Russ < rruss(a)redhat.com > > wrote: > > > > > > ----- "Dan Allen" <d... > > > > > -- > Lincoln Baxter, III > http://ocpsoft.com > http://scrumshark.com > "Keep it Simple" > > > -- > Lincoln Baxter, III > http://ocpsoft.com > http://scrumshark.com > "Keep it Simple" > > > > -- > Lincoln Baxter, III > http://ocpsoft.com > http://scrumshark.com > "Keep it Simple"