Well,
here my question is for you Randall: do you ever think about an
opportunity to configure single sequencer to let the final user the
decision of how many infos sequence? This could be one case where we
could let the user free to decide sequencer's deepness, isn't it?
BTW, this could be another use case for Smooks, and I'm thinking we
could define a specific SmooksSequencer interface to be implemented by
single sequencers, having some hooks for cache and eventually if you
agree for specific configurations about deepness of sequencing. What about?
bye
S.
Randall Hauch wrote on 16/06/08 06:14:
Very good question. The project information and dependency
management
aspects, I believe, are the most useful. Maybe we could start small
and get that kind of stuff working, and then enhance it at a later date?
Thoughts? Please weigh in, everyone.
Randall
On Jun 15, 2008, at 3:25 PM, Michael Trezzi wrote:
> Hello,
> I am creating a schema for the Maven2 POM sequencer, however I see
> that the POM syntax is HUGE and contains tons of things. I just want
> to ask what are your opinions what should be sequenced. There are
> basically 2 options:
>
> a) everything (basically mirroring the XML structure)
> b) only a subset for which I would probably take: groupId,
> artifactId, version, name, description, url, licenses, dependencies
> (all metadata excluding exclusions)
>
> Thanks in advance for your opinions.
>
> Michael Trezzi
>
> _______________________________________________
> dna-dev mailing list
> dna-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/dna-dev
_______________________________________________
dna-dev mailing list
dna-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/dna-dev