Guys,
I was running some tests using SVN Repository Source. I got a few NPEs
really easy to solve and also some issues related to requests trying
to load "jcr:content[2]" properties from nodes. I was about to create
a jira issue for this, but I saw you guys are already working on
tickets DNA-240 and DNA-36 related to SVN connector.
I appreciate if you guys could put DNA-240 back on release 0.6 since
we from Caravela are very interested on using DNA connectors,
including svn connector.
Best regards,
Feu Teston
On Aug 25, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Randall Hauch wrote:
During the 0.6 release cycle, we've added a few new features and
fixed
quite a few issues with the graph library, connectors, and JCR
implementation [1]. In fact, a number of the issues required some
fairly significant refactoring of the state management components in
our JCR implementation. The original 0.6 plan, however, was include a
search and query feature. I've made a lot of progress with search/
query, but I still have a few weeks of completing the feature
development and integrating it with the connectors and JCR
implementation. There are also a number of outstanding issues that we
need/want to fix, so I'd guess we're still a month away from the
planned 0.6 release.
However, a number of people have taken a look at 0.5 recently, and
they've run into some of the same issues that we've already fixed.
They're currently using trunk, but have asked when the next stable
release will be available. We can either continue our current plans,
or change our schedule a bit and release 0.6 without the search/query
feature (or the fantastic Eclipse publishing plug-in). For the
record, we released 0.5 on June 11, and that's just under 3 months
ago.
I'm leaning toward releasing 0.6 early and moving the search/query and
Eclipse features to the following release (which may actually be a 1.0
candidate). That would require me putting aside the search/query
stuff for a few days (maybe a week) so that I can focus on fixing a
number of the more critical and high-priority issues (we still have a
few TCK regressions that we should fix before releasing) and
reviewing/
editing the documentation. But I think it's worth it so that we can
get another much more stable release out the door for people to use.
Please share your thoughts and comments. I would like to decide
within a day or two.
Best regards,
Randall
[1]
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/DNA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
_______________________________________________
dna-dev mailing list
dna-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/dna-dev