Copying a discussion from another thread in another mailing list:
Gunnar Morling:
I'm big -1 on Slack as long as it requires people to have a pay-for-license
to get hold of the history for anything longer back than a few days
(depending on traffic in chat rooms). This equates to loosing parts of our
organizational memory unless paying ransom to Slack. Even if we manage to
get some license for ourselves (dunno whether they have some OSS program),
other users will be faced with the same problem, IIUC.
Guillaume Smet:
So Slack is by far the best UI to my taste (and it has sound in the webapp
\o/).
But:
- there's no GitHub/Google authentication and it's always good to have to
get external people in. Creating a new account is often an obstacle.
- the history limit is a no-no. And I don't think we will have budget to
pay for a paid instance. I don't see any specific plans for Open Source
organizations.
Not sure how Kabir planned to live with the history limit, I'll ask him.
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 08:49, Yoann Rodiere <yoann(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> Assuming the new chat platform takes off, there's a risk it
might be too
successful as well
Ok. Well, I guess we'll see. As I mentioned above, I don't think forcing
people to have a GitHub account will be very effective, but I can't suggest
a perfect solution either. Bots answering with a few links (documentation,
etc.) to the first message of each user come to mind, but that could be
considered rude, so I wouldn't do that unless the traffic becomes
unmanageable. Other solutions include kicking out "spammers" (but that
doesn't work if it's many users asking a single question), or making the
-dev rooms invite-only and only checking the user rooms once in a while
(might work if Gitter sends emails when your are mentioned while offline).
So, yeah, in short: I don't really know.
> More just accountability. But if some form of login in needed to use
Gitter, that's enough for me. Sounded like the other option was "allow
anonymous", which I wanted to avoid.
Then it should be fine: anonymous access apparently only allows to read
messages. Login through GitLab, GitHub or Twitter is necessary in order to
start posting new messages.
Yoann Rodière
Hibernate NoORM Team
yoann(a)hibernate.org
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 19:34, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> For me its not so much about "the right kind of people". More just
> accountability. But if some form of login in needed to use Gitter, that's
> enough for me. Sounded like the other option was "allow anonymous", which
> I wanted to avoid.
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:41 AM Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 17:27, Yoann Rodiere <yoann(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > I don't see why we should force people to have a GitHub account,
>> considering there are other means of logging into Gitter.
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>> >
>> > As to getting the right type of people, I'm not sure it's relevant.
>> Most people are likely to have one, and those who don't are likely to not
>> have one for political reasons (think free software extremists) rather than
>> because they aren't tech savvy enough: while the "hibernate" naming
might
>> confuse users looking for information about grizzly bears, I doubt my
>> grandmother, my 7-year-old nephew or even my non-software-engineer of a
>> wife would end up on Gitter by mistake.
>>
>> Well since that's obvious, clearly I was referring to a different way
>> of cathegorizing people joining@ not by age or expertise in technology
>> but in having reasonable expectations and willing to do some research
>> before bothering us all.
>>
>> You probably weren't around yet, but Hibernate has had hard times in
>> which it was "victim of its own success": just too many
>> kinda-interested people making a ton of basic questions that could be
>> easily solved otherwise.
>>
>> Some "barriers" we have in place have made it manageable; of course I
>> can't tell if it's all merit of the barriers of entry or just people
>> coming in lower volumes with better intentions, but I'm confident that
>> some of the barriers we have have helped to keep some sanity (e.g.
>> login on #hibernate-dev on IRC requiring an account).
>>
>> Assuming the new chat platform takes off, there's a risk it might be
>> too successful as well. But I guess we'll see, or let's use a very
>> bad chat platform so to keep people from coming :P
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Yoann Rodière
>> > Hibernate NoORM Team
>> > yoann(a)hibernate.org
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 18:02, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 16:02, Steve Ebersole
<steve(a)hibernate.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > What is it a conscious decision to not require a GitHub account to
>> join these rooms? I just noticed that is a toggle-option in the room's
>> settings also.
>> >>
>> >> I don't remember. We created these rooms as an experiment in 2014..
>> >> Yoann created some more rooms recently.
>> >>
>> >> Should we enforce people to have a Github account? I'd like that, I
>> >> think it would better nudge towards getting the right type of people
>> >> to join.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Sanne
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 6:17 AM Guillaume Smet <
>> guillaume.smet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:35 AM Sanne Grinovero <
>> sanne(a)hibernate.org>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > If one wants a lot of features then clearly only Slack is
the
>> way to
>> >> >> > go. Not saying we should go with Slack, just that
we'll need to
>> be
>> >> >> > patient and we'll always be short of some features -
if that's
>> not
>> >> >> > acceptable then only Slack will make you happy.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> TBH, I don't care about fancy features. Gitter is OK for me
but
>> yeah not
>> >> >> having sound is really annoying.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I might miss notifications from time to time.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In any case, it will mostly be a problem for you all if you
ping
>> me :).
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > BTW the issue you linked to suggests the native clients
don't
>> have
>> >> >> > this specific problem.. might want to try that?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I prefer to have it in the browser where I do most of my
>> interactions with
>> >> >> people.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And AFAIK, Yoann wrote they were only packaged as deb (and not
>> very excited
>> >> >> about compiling it).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> BTW, tbh, I'm a bit worried GitLab has only one dev on it
if they
>> want to
>> >> >> become a player in this area. They certainly have some work to
do
>> to catch
>> >> >> up with others.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Guillaume
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> >> >> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> >> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>
>