Hi,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:15:26AM +0100, Gunnar Morling wrote:
I'm curious how the weekly release scheme is going to work out.
In the last
two sprints we created none (although I thought we wanted to release HS?)
and one (HV, as planned) release. Planning for four releases now may be
over-stretching it a bit, esp. when splitting up powers as we do in the
first week. I would have planned for 4.1.2 and a 4.2 release.
I agree. I was surprised to see 4 schedules releases for this sprint.
I have a hard time seeing this as realistic and to a certain degree scary.
As you say, it's too many issues, we will not be able to do them
all.
Personally, I like a realistic schedule more, IMO it gives you a better
sense of achievement if you actually managed to tackle what you had
planned.
+1
Now we'll more likely get the feeling that we failed to do half
of
the things planned (as we know that's expected, still I find it
sub-optimal).
+1
I started with compiling the OGM code base and now need to set it up
in my IDE and read some docs. Once I am a bit more familiar with all I'll
pick an issue from the list.
Before that though, I need to finish the Validator blog? What is the status
on in.relation.to? Can one create blog entries again?
--Hardy
P.S.: I know this might not go down so well, but depending on the state
of in.relation.to we might have to consider to put some effort into the blog
conversion.