looks like a very good idea, does this mean people don't need to do this (taken from docs): "It is critical that batchSize in the previous example matches the batch_size value described previously." ? Should we remove the option and references from documentation? 2008/6/21 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org&gt;: I never liked the way we work around mass insertion and OOME today hibernate.search.worker.batch_size has many drawbacks - the value is not accessible programatically - it applies to any operations regardless of mass indexing - it is used 99% of the time in close conjunction with a % and session.clear() - the side effect is quite big as the index is "transactionally" committed To replace it, I introduced session.flushToIndexes(); this method manually triggers changes in queue. It does not trigger an hibernate core flush(). This seems more reasonable and will make the code safer. WDYT? Better name? -- Emmanuel Bernard emmanuel(a)hibernate.org http://in.relation.to http://blog.emmanuelbernard.com http://twitter.com/emmanuelbernard _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev