January 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: General Discussion on MetaTypes assigned to certain Mana

by bytor99999

The same as the last post with Destinations for messageCounters=ManagedProperty{messageCounters,messageCounters,metaType=MutableCompositeMetaType{org.jboss.jms.server.messagecounter.MessageCounter items=[name=count type=java.lang.Integer], [name=countDelta type=java.lang.Integer], [name=counterAsString type=java.lang.String], [name=destinationDurable type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=destinationName type=java.lang.String], [name=destinationSubscription type=java.lang.String], [name=destinationTopic type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=historyAsString type=java.lang.String], [name=historyLimit type=java.lang.Integer], [name=lastUpdate type=java.lang.Long], [name=messageCount type=java.lang.Integer], [name=messageCountDelta type=java.lang.Integer]}}, And all the Operations that return values like listAllMessages Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125273#4125273 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125273

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: General Discussion on MetaTypes assigned to certain Mana

by bytor99999

JMS Destinations The following three serverPeer=ManagedProperty{serverPeer,serverPeer,metaType=MutableCompositeMetaType{javax.management.ObjectName items=[name=MBeanServer type=javax.management.MBeanServer], [name=canonicalKeyPropertyListString type=java.lang.String], [name=canonicalName type=java.lang.String], [name=domain type=java.lang.String], [name=domainPattern type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=keyPropertyList type=java.util.Map], [name=keyPropertyListString type=java.lang.String], [name=pattern type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=propertyPattern type=java.lang.Boolean]}} expiryQueue=ManagedProperty{expiryQueue,expiryQueue,metaType=MutableCompositeMetaType{javax.management.ObjectName items=[name=MBeanServer type=javax.management.MBeanServer], [name=canonicalKeyPropertyListString type=java.lang.String], [name=canonicalName type=java.lang.String], [name=domain type=java.lang.String], [name=domainPattern type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=keyPropertyList type=java.util.Map], [name=keyPropertyListString type=java.lang.String], [name=pattern type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=propertyPattern type=java.lang.Boolean]}}, DLQ=ManagedProperty{DLQ,DLQ,metaType=MutableCompositeMetaType{javax.management.ObjectName items=[name=MBeanServer type=javax.management.MBeanServer], [name=canonicalKeyPropertyListString type=java.lang.String], [name=canonicalName type=java.lang.String], [name=domain type=java.lang.String], [name=domainPattern type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=keyPropertyList type=java.util.Map], [name=keyPropertyListString type=java.lang.String], [name=pattern type=java.lang.Boolean], [name=propertyPattern type=java.lang.Boolean]}}, name=ManagedProperty{name,name,metaType=SimpleMetaType:java.lang.String}, To be consistent and also really help me out. Shouldn't the items in a Map also be of a MetaType instead of direct Java types? Maybe even the keys. If properties nest in terms of types, like a List of Maps or a Map which has some Lists which are Lists of Maps, it makes it easier to read and create adapters when you are always are dealing directly with MetaTypes and MetaValues. Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125272#4125272 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125272

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: General Discussion on MetaTypes assigned to certain Mana

by bytor99999

In JMS Destinations securityConfig=ManagedProperty{securityConfig,securityConfig,metaType=MutableCompositeMetaType{org.w3c.dom.Element items=[name=schemaTypeInfo type=org.w3c.dom.TypeInfo], [name=tagName type=java.lang.String]}}, A CompositeMetaType holds a map of values. /** The contents */ private SortedMap<String, MetaValue> contents; However for security config, I think in terms of a List of users, that have a map of attributes. For our Embedded Console UI, the List of Maps works perfect to create a user interaction that makes sense. But if it were just a Map of values, that would not work as you wouldn't be able to determine which User got which values. Thank you guys for your help View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125271#4125271 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125271

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - General Discussion on MetaTypes assigned to certain ManagedP

by bytor99999

So instead of creating a new thread for each one that I come across, I am going to post in this thread. So far there is the DataSource Connection Properties View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125268#4125268 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125268

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: EJB/War deployer ordering problem

by alesj

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : The real issue is that war components should be started after all other non-wars in the current deployment unit tree. Need to look into how that could be done. | The things here is that a mbean component (in this case EJB container) must delay the whole war processing. Which is luckily possible with the introduction of MC dependency into deployers. This means we need to gather all possible information about the components that are candidates to do some outside war calls and put dependencies to war. Perhaps staring with EJBs will for now do the trick. btw: Scott, since I know you're busy with the JBW presentation :-), I can have a crack at this first thing in the morning ... and we can discuss it at AS5/MC call View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125267#4125267 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125267

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: EJB/War deployer ordering problem

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

A jndi lookup is not a sufficient expression of dependency for the mc to detect this. In general we are not going to support lookup(x) implies a dependnecy on x because there is no guarantee x resolves to a component as know to the mc. We already have jndi dependency implementations, but you have to know what component provides the jndi binding to use it. If a component is doing a jndi lookup and it fails, this would have to roll back the current war deployment and add a dependency on the name. That is a big change to deployment processing. The real issue is that war components should be started after all other non-wars in the current deployment unit tree. Need to look into how that could be done. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125252#4125252 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125252

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Datasource Connection Properties using CollectionMetaTyp

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

CompositeMetaType with CompositeValue is the most logical representation of a Properties. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125241#4125241 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125241

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: extra jars needed when deploying a Seam app into JBAS5 b

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

Charles, please post or send me and Ales the console log of startup. Ales, AFAICS the app is set up correctly and this is another problem. Back to some deployer trying to load all classes and their dependencies - IIRC Scott fixed this for beta3. Also, if's a WAR deployment putting the jbas5.jar into WEB-INF/lib is correct. The discussion is about something else (how we do the integration). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125240#4125240 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125240

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: extra jars needed when deploying a Seam app into JBAS5 b

by alesj

"charles.crouch(a)jboss.com" wrote : | "alesj" wrote : At the moment we did it that way, but the discussion about it will take place at JBW. | So this can't be addressed until JBW? Can we not start the discussion now :-) | Sure. If you have some ideas how to make this easier, go ahead. But this should be as transparent as possible to Seam code. Aka non vendor agnostic. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125236#4125236 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125236

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: extra jars needed when deploying a Seam app into JBAS5 b

by charles.crouch＠jboss.com

"alesj" wrote : And since you're deploying Seam core with your app, you cannot simply put a single jboss-seam-as5.jar into configuration lib, because the VFS impl would then miss the Scanner class. | Ok, from talking to Pete I had the jboss-seam-jbas5.jar in WEB-INF/lib. "alesj" wrote : At the moment we did it that way, but the discussion about it will take place at JBW. So this can't be addressed until JBW? Can we not start the discussion now :-) Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125235#4125235 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125235

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2008