"charles.crouch(a)jboss.com" wrote :
| Any ideas why/how this is occurring and what can be done about it?
|
Since you need to make Seam be VFS aware.
And since you're deploying Seam core with your app, you cannot simply put a single jboss-seam-as5.jar into configuration lib, because the VFS impl would then miss the Scanner class.
Meaning, Seam As5 specific classes would be in parent CL of Seam core CL, and hence not being able to see them
At the moment we did it that way, but the discussion about it will take place at JBW.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125215#4125215
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125215
It's hard for me to say for sure without knowing for sure what your issue is. I'll I can do is *assume* the issue was due to slow or non-existent replies to intra-cluster calls made by the jboss:service=DefaultPartition service.
If that was the problem, then yes, using many smaller clusters could help isolate the problem to a few machines rather than having it effect all of them.
But be careful about the assumption above. In most use cases there are not a lot of calls over the jboss:service=DefaultPartition after the nodes have started. If you are seeing continued cluster-wide issues after startup, there's a good chance this is not the issue.
Please be sure to raise a support case on the customer support portal, where we have better tools available to diagnose your problem.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125174#4125174
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125174
Seam only does a simple JNDI lookup. Which is perfectly allowed.
A JNDI lookup can happen anywhere at any time without MC knowing any explicit dependency.
One way to solve this is to hook JNP to MC, so that if something is not found open deployments are resolved first until either the JNDI name appears or MC is done with deploying. In the later case it would result in a NameNotFoundException.
(It can even remember (persistently) which bean made it pop-up so future deployments will be faster.)
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125151#4125151
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125151
Hi,
I am the "customer" that incoutered this issue with log4j and NFS. In our TEST Jboss cluster, we solved this by installing all our JBOSS AS into a local file system insteed of NFS. Since then, it never happed again.
But just this morning, we had the same issue in our PRODUCTION environement. Meaning that all EJB calls inter-jboss where dreadfully slow. We solved it by restarting one of our Jboss that was somehow "stuck" ( but not by log4j that time!).
The problem is this: when just one Jboss server is stuck, the whole Jgroup cluster is stuck. This issue is terrible for us, because we have a big heterogenous cluster with 20 applications (nodes) on it. So when this issue araises, all the application are not working.
My question is this: if we switch to several homogenous cluster ( each application has it how small cluster (partition) of 2 to 4 nodes), will this leverage the effect of this issue ?
Thanks in advance.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4125145#4125145
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4125145