Mark Little [
http://community.jboss.org/people/marklittle] created the discussion
"Re: Remote Txn Inflow: Synchronizations"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/630242#630242
--------------------------------------------------------------
No inconsistency. They're best effort.
Tom Jenkinson wrote:
As we are somewhat free to implement this behavior free of spec constraints (as it
isn't in a spec) we are free to make these kind of descisions. I worry though that by
not attempting to perform afterCompletion after the transaction has been commit/rollback
we are introducing an inconsistency with JTS that will be confusing to a user who is
familiar with JTS?
For now I will proceed down the line of calling aftercompletion as part of
commit/rollback as you requested, if we decide that this needs its own phase after further
consultation with the community (Jonathan/Mark?) we can factor it into a separate cycle.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/630242#630242]
Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]