August 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - XAResourceWrapper for WebSphereMQ XA (JBAS-3183)

by weston.price＠jboss.com

The WebSphereMQ XA bug requires that the underlying XAResource from WASMQ be wrapped to return false to the isSameRM method. This is the same situation that required the Oracle override flag in XAManagedConnectionFactory. My plan is to add a flag to the JmsManagedConnectionFactory that would enable wrapping the XAResource if this is required. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968650#3968650 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3968650

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: UOW port to JCA adapter for JBAS-3183

by adrian＠jboss.org

While you are in there, can you also implement this feature? http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3321 This only applies for CMT/Required (for other types the delivery transcation gets suspended anwyay). You can find the code for other EJBs in org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968649#3968649 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3968649

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: Profiler basically sucks

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

"Kunthar" wrote : After 3 hours of garbage work, this profiler sucks. | 1. Installation sucks, | Impossible to work on win32 with jboss 4.0.4 G.A a mountain Zion and JRE 1.4.2. I agree with you on the interface. However the installation is pretty simple. Just add -XrunjbossInspector:/directory and you're done. Other profiler are way much more complicated to install than this one. anonymous wrote : | 2. After testing two different jboss installations and including JDK 1.5, appearing interface sucks, | getting gzip errors, stream errors all those nonsense sucks. | You probably didn't do something basic as stopping the ouptut. anonymous wrote : | Why i wrote this? | Simply i hate spending my time with garbage pet projects and i already spent my time with pet hair profiler around 3-4 hours. | | You need professional error details, some outputs? Go get yourself... | | Great job, | Kunthar | You want that level of support/confidence... go buy a license of a commercial product! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968647#3968647 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3968647

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: UOW port to JCA adapter for JBAS-3183

by weston.price＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | Equally, it could just create a real JTA transaction anyway. | For 1PC these have very little overhead. | This would seem to be the best approach to me since we wouldn't have to rely on the 'useLocalTX' flag and just create a transaction under any circumstance. It definitely would make all of this cleaner. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968646#3968646 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3968646

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: UOW port to JCA adapter for JBAS-3183

by weston.price＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | Using the XIDFactory from JBossJTA is one mechanism, | but not necessarily the cleanest, especially when | we are moving to JBossTM for JBoss5 anyway. | Right, which caused me to think about this prior to using this mechanism. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968644#3968644 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3968644

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: UOW port to JCA adapter for JBAS-3183

by adrian＠jboss.org

Equally, it could just create a real JTA transaction anyway. For 1PC these have very little overhead. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968641#3968641 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3968641

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Profiler basically sucks

by Kunthar

After 3 hours of garbage work, this profiler sucks. 1. Installation sucks, Impossible to work on win32 with jboss 4.0.4 G.A a mountain Zion and JRE 1.4.2. 2. After testing two different jboss installations and including JDK 1.5, appearing interface sucks, getting gzip errors, stream errors all those nonsense sucks. Why i wrote this? Simply i hate spending my time with garbage pet projects and i already spent my time with pet hair profiler around 3-4 hours. You need professional error details, some outputs? Go get yourself... Great job, Kunthar View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968640#3968640 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3968640

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Specifying Default Client Binding

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

why? It needs to be fixed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968638#3968638 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3968638

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: UOW port to JCA adapter for JBAS-3183

by adrian＠jboss.org

The XIDFactory is a red-herring. It is only used when it is configured with an XAConnectionFactory and it knows it is going to eventually use 1PC, i.e. there will be no other resources in the transaction. This will be true for BMT or CMT/NotSupported. In this case, it optimizes away the JTA transaction and drives the "transaction" itself. All it needs is a mechanism to generate unique XIDs so it can control the XAResource. Using the XIDFactory from JBossJTA is one mechanism, but not necessarily the cleanest, especially when we are moving to JBossTM for JBoss5 anyway. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968637#3968637 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3968637

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - ObjectContextualizer - Cast to Hibernate Implementation Clas

by louth

Hi, With the recent JBoss Portal releases have run into a issue with a Hibernate extension we created because of a the class within the Portal that explicitly references an Hibernate implementation class rather than the standard interface. Can the following not be done via the standard configuration file. public class ObjectContextualizer { public Object context; public ObjectContextualizer(Object context) { this.context = context; } public void attach(SessionFactory sessionFactory) { EventListeners listeners = ((SessionFactoryImpl)sessionFactory).getEventListeners(); PostLoadEventListener[] lels1 = listeners.getPostLoadEventListeners(); PostLoadEventListener[] lels2 = new PostLoadEventListener[lels1.length + 1]; System.arraycopy(lels1, 0, lels2, 1, lels1.length); lels2[0] = new PostLoadEventListener() { public void onPostLoad(PostLoadEvent postLoadEvent) { Object entity = postLoadEvent.getEntity(); if (entity instanceof ContextObject) { ContextObject object = (ContextObject)entity; object.setContext(context); } } }; listeners.setPostLoadEventListeners(lels2); } } View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968628#3968628 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3968628

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums August 2006