May 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - XMPP integration - building an XMPP gateway

by zzzz8

This is a continuation of the user forum post: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=109334 I think I'm interested in learning how to build an XMPP gateway. Any assistance would be appreciated - I'll see how far I can get along, given I have limited time and resources (doesn't everyone? :) ). Or perhaps it'll inspire someone else to help, too. Thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048124#4048124 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048124

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Java 5 and JBM

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I'm in vacation mode.. but I couldn't avoid looking at the dev forum/ answering this :-) IMO we should start using JDK 5. If someone come with a JDK 1.4 requirement later, we could use retroweaving. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048109#4048109 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048109

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Java 5 and JBM

by weston.price＠jboss.com

Yes. I do. Backwards compatibility has it's place but when it becomes an obstacle in and of itself it's time to draw a line. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048079#4048079 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048079

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Java 5 and JBM

by timfox

The next release of JBM (1.2.0.SP2) only works properly with JBAS 4.2.0 and later, and JBAS 4.2.0 or later requires JDK 5. Do you think we should stop supporting Java 1.4 with JBM? If we go Java 5 only, then we can start using the new language constructs, and benefit from the improved concurrency utils etc Do you think we should do this? Comments please. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048076#4048076 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048076

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Tools (dev)] - Re: JBoss IDE vs Red Hat Developer Studio....what is the dif

by rjstanford

Sorry of this is the wrong place to ask, but is there an expected/public timeline for the RHDS release? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048065#4048065 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048065

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: Issues with connection creating using JMSContainerInvoke

by weston.price＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | SHOW EVIDENCE! | Please do. I can't quite understand what you are seeing as the Session created always originates from the original connection. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048040#4048040 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048040

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: Feature request to implement redelivery delay

by weston.price＠jboss.com

Currently, redelivery is done via transactions (either local or XA). I suppose an option could be added to the adapter as well as legacy ASF stuff to delay for a configurable period before relaying the failure back to the provider. It won't be 'real time' but since nothing in JMS provides real time guarantees this is probably ok. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048036#4048036 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048036

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Excessive type safety warnings ...

by genman

Eclipse lists over 4000 warnings for JBossCache, mostly to do with type safety. I started trying to fix some of the type safety warnings by adding type parameters to declarations of Cache, Node, etc. The problem is, is that classes such as NodeListener, NodeData, StateTransferGenerator, etc. do not have type parameters. To get everything to work right will require adding some type parameters. But for some of those classes, it doesn't really seem appropriate to have type parameters like <K, V> tied into their implementation. Thoughts? Or are you going to live with all those warnings ... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048013#4048013 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048013

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: Issues with connection creating using JMSContainerInvoke

by timfox

Evidence is on its way... I am very busy this week, but will get round to it next week :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047990#4047990 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047990

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Feature request to implement redelivery delay

by timfox

I have added a feature request for the JCA layer to implement redelivery delay for MDBs. This is a nice feature in many jms providers which is currently unusable when using them with MDBs in JBoss. http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4438 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047989#4047989 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047989

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2007