May 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Java 5 and JBM

by timfox

We've bought into the AMQP idea already. JBM is already part of the Red Hat strategy for messaging. This has already been worked out and agreed at the highest levels. You can think of JBM as RHM for the app server although it will still be called JBM. RHM is really just a branding. JBM will support AMQP in version 2.0. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048166#4048166 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048166

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Java 5 and JBM

by bdecoste

Sorry man, but I have to disagree. The problem with messaging is interoperability. JMS has failed miserably at that. So has JBoss. Red Hat gets it. AMQP may be suck or it may rock, but jesus it's the right idea. The future of JBM is helping Red Hat Messaging become the best JMS provider we can be. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048164#4048164 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048164

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Java 5 and JBM

by timfox

"bdecoste" wrote : The leader in messaging is Red Hat. Not JBoss. Not sure I can be any more clear. #1 Please don't hijack other threads to make unsubstantiated random comments. If you're going to blurt at least back this up with facts. #2 The leader in messaging at Red Hat is certainly not the RHM project. From a product marketing perspective we are quite different products serving quite different markets. RHM is targeted to the OS integrated, non JMS world. JBM is the preferred messaging system for people who require JEE integration (RHM has none), high performance clustering (RHM clustering is still on the whiteboard), XA capabilities and all the other things people need in the real world. JBM will be the default JMS provider in the application server platform in the 4.2 series. RHM is nowhere near even being considered for this View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048161#4048161 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048161

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Java 5 and JBM

by weston.price＠jboss.com

I don't think anything you have to say is worthwhile. I think the JBM project was under difffernent leadershp before, and I agreed with that course of direction. I don't agree with you and your 'regime. You have clogged the JCA dev forum with constant bullshit that usually involves basic questions about JMS, not even JCA!. Do you know anything about messaging or do you just shotgun the community looking for an answer and then you pawn it off as your own? You just talk and talk and talk...you never stop...For fuck's sake dude, I would PAY the money to use WASMQ simply so I would not have to listen to your pendantic bullshit. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048160#4048160 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048160

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Java 5 and JBM

by bdecoste

The leader in messaging is Red Hat. Not JBoss. Not sure I can be any more clear. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048159#4048159 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048159

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBoss Messaging and NIO

by frofake

Sorry, now I got it. So, its not decided yet which of the frameworks to use (MINA, Remoting), this is something we should explore. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048157#4048157 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048157

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Dynamic redeployment within JBPM

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

basically, if you have a mapping between old states and new states, you could convert a process instance from one process definition to the next version the old logs should be kept in the old process instance, the new logs in the new process instance. there should be a bidirectional reference between the old process and the new process instance but that still needs to be implemented. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048156#4048156 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048156

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Java 5 and JBM

by timfox

"bdecoste" wrote : Red Hat Messaging. Not sure what else I can say. Not sure what you're trying to say here. Can you elaborate? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048155#4048155 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048155

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - How can i secure cahe instance in network(Using JGroups repl

by gaddesurendrakumar

How can i secure cahe instance in network(Using JGroups replication) Is there a way to ristrict to acess clustered instance? Thanks Surendra kumar View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048154#4048154 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048154

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBoss Messaging and NIO

by frofake

Actually I was also considering MINA-like tooleset. So just to confirm: making JBM NIO based actually means adjusting JJBRemoting NIO based. Am I right? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048153#4048153 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048153

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2007