November 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: DU cannot supply own demands?

by ALRubinger

The thing with my example is that it isn't an MC bean. It's an EJB container, and injection doesn't happen into the container but into the bean instances. So injection into a bean instance doesn't preclude starting the container. There's no cyclic dependency in that sense. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192588#4192588 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192588

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: DU cannot supply own demands?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

They both are dependencies, just with a little different defaults. Based on the FAQ item I created when I was looking at the difference before, it should be started but not installed: Q8 What is the difference between depends and demand elements? A8: depend is a dependencyItem on the referenced bean reaching its Start state before the dependee will be allowed to reach its Start state. Demand is a dependencyItem on the referenced bean reaching its Installed state before the dependee will be allowed to reach its whenRequired(state attribute of demand) state. This does not say exactly when injection happens though. Ales? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192584#4192584 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192584

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: InterceptorSimpleIfaceDeploymentTestCase

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Yes, only the ManagementView interface methods are being intercepted. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192581#4192581 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192581

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: ProfileService Guidance

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

The test would need to use the profileservice DeploymentManager api rather than the old MainDeployer as this bypasses registration of the deployment with the profileservice and it won't be visible in the profile. See the org.jboss.test.profileservice.test.DeployUnitTestCase. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192580#4192580 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192580

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JMS ConnectionFactory not bound issue

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

I am going to fix this by adding this file to the messaging module in AS5 workspace until the messaging team figures out a AS release plan that verifies that their releases do not mess. ;) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192579#4192579 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192579

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4.1.GA ready

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

[url]http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192570[url] Did the release miss the connection-factories-service.xml?[/url] View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192576#4192576 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192576

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: [JBMESSAGING-1367] Create JCA resource adapter for JBM 2

by timfox

javax.jms.ServerSessionPool was part of the JMS ASF (application server facilities) monstrosity classes from the JMS spec. Since we won't be using connection consumer, this should definitely not be necessary: http://java.sun.com/javaee/5/docs/api/javax/jms/ServerSessionPool.html View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192574#4192574 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192574

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: [JBMESSAGING-1367] Create JCA resource adapter for JBM 2

by timfox

"jesper.pedersen" wrote : | These are used in the inflow part of the resource adaptor currently (in the class that implements javax.jms.ServerSessionPool). | Can you take me through why that is necessary? anonymous wrote : | The DLQ functionality is also used in the inflow part - just for your information. | Hmmm, JBM already has DLQ I don't follow why this would be necessary for a JBM 2.0 only RA... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192571#4192571 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192571

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JMS ConnectionFactory not bound issue

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

This file is supposed to be bundled as per the messaging workspace. | anil@localhost:~/messaging/Branch_1_4$ find . -name connection-factories-service.xml | ./integration/EAP4/etc/server/default/deploy/connection-factories-service.xml | ./integration/AS5/etc/server/default/deploy/connection-factories-service.xml | ./output/etc/server/default/deploy/connection-factories-service.xml | ./output/jar/connection-factories-service.xml | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192570#4192570 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192570

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: [JBMESSAGING-1367] Create JCA resource adapter for JBM 2

by jesper.pedersen

anonymous wrote : max messages and max session - these can probably go These are used in the inflow part of the resource adaptor currently (in the class that implements javax.jms.ServerSessionPool). anonymous wrote : All the dlq stuff can go - JBM has its own sophisticated dlq system The DLQ functionality is also used in the inflow part - just for your information. Thanks for the pointer to the internal API - I'll look it over and post some design. I think we should aim for a solution that uses as much of the existing resource adaptor as possible for the first beta. After getting it up and running we can start to make optimizations. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192569#4192569 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192569

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2008