November 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-6105; Improve start-up time

by alesj

"dimitris(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Ales, I think the whole point is that by default the server should be fast for the majority of deployments. If you need to deploy extra descriptors and stuff, the game is lost. | Sure, but how else are you gonna know, if we need to scan or not? Or what/where to scan? e.g. afaik EJB3 deployments don't need any descriptors any more It's the job of container to pick up EJB3 @annotations, hence you need to scan it all. Unless user provides more detailed info about what/where to scan. e.g. only scan my-ejbs.jar's org.acme.foo.ejbs package But as you can see, I added ListDeploymentUnitFilter to scaning deployer (FilteredAnnotationEnvironmentDeployer), so you're free to add any constraints to that chain. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192702#4192702 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192702

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4.1.GA ready

by gaohoward

Hi Anil, Sorry for the late response. The connection-factories-service.xml was missing in the JBM resources artifact in the maven repo. I just updated and it should be fine now. https://svn.jboss.org/repos/repository.jboss.org/maven2/jboss/messaging/r... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192697#4192697 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192697

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - JBAS-6105; Improve start-up time

by alesj

Moving JIRAs posts to forum: "Radim Marek" wrote : | Hi, I know you're probably trying to get JBoss AS 5.0 release out 'as soon as possible', but isn't a startup time and general performance quite important for initial reviews and feedback? | | I'm asking because after trying to develop on 5.0.0.CR2 the 'slowdown' is noticeable and it's something that is actually quite annoying. As example, re-deployment of the packages for my latest project is significantly slower (50 - 75%) and more CPU intensive than with 4.2.3.GA. Tried both with JEE deployment on default profile and minimal profile with micro-container services. Haven't got any feedback for general on-the-fly performance. | | I'm asking because although it's not valid comparison, I guess it would be easy to compare speed improvements with other open source application servers. "alesj" wrote : | Radim, did you try the trunk? | We introduced VFS caching in between, which should speed up things considerably. "Radim Marek" wrote : | Ales, I've just tested three configurations - 4.2.3GA, 5.0.0.CR2 and the trunk (as of today 2pm) - and can't see any significant difference in deployment speed using trunk, but the startup time is in average 2s longer than with CR2 (default profile). | | Test is performed using custom EAR file (8 MB size) and 60MB WAR file. I'm now trying to establish some reasonable - easy to replicate test. Both test are having very simple deployment structure - so no Seam or things that would involve heavy pre-processing during deployment. | | The WAR file I'm using is on average deployed in about 9 seconds on 4.2.3.GA, whereas more than twice that time on 5.0.0.CR2/trunk; significantly more utilizing CPU as well. | | Test is performed using Java 5 and 6 on Mac OS X; and to have reference one test done on Java 5 / Solaris 10 (x86). Tomorrow I'll try to come back with more details. | "alesj" wrote : | I'm just about to commit MC changes - Kernel and Deployers. Deployers change will address scanning performance - if you have jboss-scanning.xml present it will scan accordingly to those rules. See Deployers project's test for jboss-scanning.xml usage. | "dimitris(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Can you move this to a forum thead? Ales, I think the whole point is that by default the server should be fast for the majority of deployments. If you need to deploy extra descriptors and stuf, the game is lost. | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192696#4192696 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192696

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: jboss_5_0.xsd metadata

by timfox

Alex- For EJB config questions, best to ask in the EJB forum. We are not experts on this here. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192691#4192691 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192691

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJB3 Integration TestSuite Regressions Inventory

by wolfc

I don't like 'live' documents. Especially when they should reflect a Hudson run. The only thing I'm missing is a way to discuss the individual regression cases. I think we should just create forum threads for those. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192672#4192672 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192672

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4.1.GA ready

by gaohoward

Hi Dimitris, about point 2, i mean JBoss 5 build doesn't include the examples provided by JBM 1.4.1, is it intended? Because I think it would make sense to package the jbm examples into jb5 and should be run under JB5. So the user don't need download a separate JBM 1.4.1 in order to run the examples, as JB5 is supposed to include JBM 1.4 by default, which is different from JB4. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192663#4192663 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192663

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Recent EJB3 TestSuite Regressions

by ALRubinger

Anil's fixed the JBM integration stuff. I'm going to roll back changes from r81580 for: * consumer * circulardependency ...to fix those. That might affect the "schema" tests Alexey'd been working on. The "webservices" regressions stem from: Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/xml/stream/XMLStreamException ...which is in $JBOSS_HOME/lib/endorsed/stax-api.jar. Passes locally for me but fails on Hudson, so I'll do another run. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192660#4192660 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192660

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Reflect BeanInfo cache change breaks Kernel

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : | But it must be different since the tests I added (similar to yours printCollection) | are now passing, where before they didn't. :-) It's different due to ClassInfoImpl::equals != DelegateClassInfo::equals. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192654#4192654 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192654

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: DU cannot supply own demands?

by alesj

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : | This does not say exactly when injection happens though. Ales? | What injection? Different injections happen at different states, but all these states are intuitive. e.g. at construction/instantiation --> INSTANTIATED, at property configuration --> CONFIGURED at create method invocation --> CREATE at install invocation --> depends when you call installation ... We've been over this already: - http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects//microcontainer/trunk/ker... - http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects//microcontainer/trunk/ker... I'm not really sure why I didn't add this dependentState option to demand: | <demand whenRequired="Start" dependentState="Create">somedemand</demand> // <-- currently no dependentState attribute | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192642#4192642 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192642

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Recent EJB3 TestSuite Regressions

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

dd/mdb is going to fail until the messaging default-activation-config/activation-config is clarified. http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=146322 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192641#4192641 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192641

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2008