July 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Integrating Netty into JBM2

by trustin

I think the reason #1 doesn't make much difference because we still have an interface which is independent from any transport implementation. I don't have much idea how message chunking will be implemented, so I'd like to listen to more idea on it. At least, I'd like to remove limit and position from MessagingBuffer, and it will only simplify the implementation IMO. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162017#4162017 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162017

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Expression Evaluation in ActionHandler Properties

by camunda

anonymous wrote : Perhaps we could add it as early as jPDL 3.3? The challenge would be to pass the ExecutionContext all the way down to Instantiator.instantiate(). This requires changing the signature of a number of methods, but other than that, the coding seems straightforward. Yeah, I would agree. But it invloves really some changes in the internals... anonymous wrote : All BPM functionality will eventually have to go through the public API. I don't get the connection to th epublic API, can you please explain a bit further? Thanks and regards Bernd View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162016#4162016 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162016

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Tempranillo EOL, new repository locations

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Please see this thread http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=138452 on details which modules moved where and what revisions have been taken into consideration. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162015#4162015 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162015

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Tempranillo EOL, new repository locations

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Sorry folks, tempranillo is no more. For historical reason I moved it to https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/legacy/, however all development should take place in https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/jbpm4 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162013#4162013 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162013

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Migrating jPDL 4 to maven

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

The remaining modules have been migrated as well: jPDL | https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/tempranillo/jpdl/trunk (1449) | -> | https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/jbpm4 | Identity | https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/tempranillo/identity/trunk (1451) | -> | https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/jbpm4 | Task | https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/tempranillo/task/trunk (1452) | -> | https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/jbpm4 | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162010#4162010 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162010

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Migrating jPDL 4 to maven

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

The PVM has become an project on it's own: | https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/tempranillo/pvm/trunk (1449) | -> | https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/pvm/trunk | Read: Old location (revision) -> New Location View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162009#4162009 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162009

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Migrating jPDL 4 to maven

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Following the jPDL 4 approach I will switch the jPDL 4 code base to maven as well. This includes a new repository location: https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/jbpm4/trunk [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] JBoss jBPM 4 .......................................... SUCCESS [3.088s] [INFO] JBoss jBPM 4 - jPDL ................................... SUCCESS [4.243s] [INFO] JBoss jBPM 4 - Identity ............................... SUCCESS [2.608s] [INFO] JBoss jBPM 4 - Task ................................... SUCCESS [2.054s] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The designer and bpel modules that current reside in tempranillo will become projects on their own. At the same time I would like to shutdown the tempranillo subversion module. Any objections? Speak now, silence is agreement. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162008#4162008 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162008

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBMICROCONT-309; aliases and scoping

by adrian＠jboss.org

dependency with knock on affects into kernel View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162007#4162007 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162007

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBMICROCONT-309; aliases and scoping

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Such a semantic would lead me to the alternate conclusion, | i.e. that the structure of the controller delegation should be a part of SPI Which spi? Dependency spi? Bean metadata spi? I don't see what you mean here. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162003#4162003 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162003

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jPDL 4 early feedback

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"estaub" wrote : Is the XSD itself available? | Because it's so much more concise than javadoc, it's easier to see the big picture with the XSD - especially if you have good schema-viewing software. | i've published it for your convenience http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/jpdl4/doc/xsd/jpdl4-draft.xsd View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162000#4162000 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162000

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2008