January 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Security Deployer assuming VFSDeploymentUnit

by alesj

This should work, as there is a StructureMD check before you demand VFSDeployment: AbstractStructuralDeployers.java | Attachments attachments = deployment.getPredeterminedManagedObjects(); | StructureMetaData structureMetaData = attachments.getAttachment(StructureMetaData.class); | if (structureMetaData == null) | { | structureMetaData = StructureMetaDataFactory.createStructureMetaData(); | try | { | determineStructure(deployment, structureMetaData); | where determineStructure() is only impled for VFS based deployments. But since you already have StructureMD, you should be by-passing that VFSD check. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205465#4205465 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205465

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Transitions problem.

by ms_shitole

Hi I am using jBPM 3.2.2. In processdefinition. [img]file:///home/mansingh/LatestEclipse/workspace/websale/src/main/jpdl/processimage.jpg[/img] I am having two transition going from one task node, named First transition is: More info needed Second transition is: OK In jBPM console when i m clicking on More Info needed button then this More info needed transition is not going, instead it is choosing another transition ie OK. So why this flow is not executing properly? is their any problem while going two transitions from one node itself? guide me Thanks --MAS View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205440#4205440 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205440

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Security Deployer assuming VFSDeploymentUnit

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Yes, and I believe we got it to work in AS42. The WS Endpoint API never worked in AS50 AFAIK. Perhaps we can revisit this now and cut through it for AS50 Here is how I currently try to do this | AbstractDeployment deployment = new AbstractDeployment(alias); | factory.addContext(deployment, ""); | | ClassLoader classLoader = servlet.getClass().getClassLoader(); | | MutableAttachments mutableAttachments = (MutableAttachments)deployment.getPredeterminedManagedObjects(); | mutableAttachments.addAttachment(ClassLoaderFactory.class, new ContextClassLoaderFactory(classLoader)); | mutableAttachments.addAttachment(JBossWebMetaData.class, jbwmd); | mainDeployer.deploy(deployment); | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205438#4205438 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205438

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Sub-Profiles ProfileService changes

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

"bstansberry(a)jboss.com" wrote : You're right; I think it's fine. I'd misunderstood what the validate(ControllerContext) call was really doing. I got sucked into a unrelated debugging fest today so haven't proved it yet, but it should be fine. Just an update: as expected, this works fine. :-) I included a JMS queue in deploy-hasingleton, which got activated before the JBM server. Worked fine; when JBM got deployed the queue went through create and start. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205432#4205432 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205432

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Deployment cleanup & modifications

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

For what it's worth, I intend to make use of the JCraft implementation for XNIO-SSH. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205428#4205428 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205428

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Deployment cleanup & modifications

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

For reference, some java implementations of zip file handling I found: http://www.jcraft.com/jzlib/index.html http://jazzlib.sourceforge.net/ https://truezip.dev.java.net/ View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205427#4205427 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205427

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Using temp at undeploy

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I'm looking through the changes, and it appears this automatically identifies contexts as temps if a specified metadata file exists. In the server we would presumably register all know deployment descriptors? Its possible to have a nested deployment that has no descriptors. In that case you still will have to include a jboss-structure.xml I take it? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205426#4205426 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205426

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Deployment cleanup & modifications

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Not that this is relevant for this release, but how much of the copying is required due to jar file native locking issues? Can we do away with the need for copying by getting a java zip file implementation, or is this an issue of concurrent access to virtual files that should have a valid view even after being deleted? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205425#4205425 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205425

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - [JBCACHE-1470] Option to disable cache event generation for

by galder.zamarreno＠jboss.com

I'm back in the cache design forums. It's been a while, eh? Re: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBCACHE-1470 For the very 1st prototype of https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBCACHE-816, I'd like to implement 1470 so that I can avoid the ping pong effect explained in the JIRA. I've provided a patch for it as well so that others can check it out. Thoughts? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205400#4205400 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205400

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Labs] - Re: JBoss Community Leaders polls not working

by maeste

Any news? Sorry for the ping, but just 2 days left. If you need to contact me directly to get more infos about what I have noticed my mail is on Wise's team page. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205383#4205383 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205383

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2009