January 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Security Deployer assuming VFSDeploymentUnit

by alesj

Deja vu? ;-) We've been over this already. - http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4132130#4132130 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205377#4205377 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205377

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Java Activity not using Interface

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"camunda" wrote : Supporting both ways would be my favorite as well... | that is the plan View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205373#4205373 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205373

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Redesign of Pool Configuration

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : (02:15:19 AM) carlo: ALR: Each cache implementation should have it's own annotations, metadata and deployers. I like that as well. An implemenation detail we should remember when we do this though is user-friendliness when people mismatch their configuration. E.g. there used to be two @CacheConfig variants in different packages, one meant for SimpleCache, other for StatefulTreeCache. People would use the wrong one, which would result in the cache just using defaults. Of course, getting rid of @Cache and making the cache impl implicit based on the @CacheConfig would remove that problem. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205371#4205371 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205371

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Security Deployer assuming VFSDeploymentUnit

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

After fixing the bug in AbstractSecurityDeployer there seems to be more | 19:04:56,160 INFO [STDOUT] Caused by: org.jboss.deployers.spi.DeploymentException: Structure can only be determined for VFSDeployments org.jboss.deployers.client.plugins.deployment.AbstractDeployment@6145c5 | 19:04:56,160 INFO [STDOUT] at org.jboss.deployers.vfs.plugins.structure.VFSStructuralDeployersImpl.determineStructure(VFSStructuralDeployersImpl.java:213) | 19:04:56,160 INFO [STDOUT] at org.jboss.deployers.structure.spi.helpers.AbstractStructuralDeployers.determineStructure(AbstractStructuralDeployers.java:77) | 19:04:56,160 INFO [STDOUT] at org.jboss.deployers.plugins.main.MainDeployerImpl.determineStructure(MainDeployerImpl.java:853) | 19:04:56,160 INFO [STDOUT] at org.jboss.deployers.plugins.main.MainDeployerImpl.addDeployment(MainDeployerImpl.java:303) | 19:04:56,160 INFO [STDOUT] at org.jboss.deployers.plugins.main.MainDeployerImpl.deploy(MainDeployerImpl.java:413) | 19:04:56,203 INFO [STDOUT] at org.jboss.osgi.service.http.beans.WebAppGeneratorService.registerServlet(WebAppGeneratorService.java:79) | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205346#4205346 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205346

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Security Deployer assuming VFSDeploymentUnit

by alesj

Why does AbstractSecurityDeployer assumes VFSDeploymentUnit? Thomas, perhaps some VFS im-memory usage will get you past it. I'll look into details tomorrow. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205322#4205322 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205322

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Security Deployer assuming VFSDeploymentUnit

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

The background is that I am trying to implement an OSGi HttpService that dynamically deploys an JbossWebMetaData attached to an AbstractDeploymentUnit | AbstractDeployment deployment = new AbstractDeployment(alias); | //factory.addContext(deployment, ""); | | ClassLoader classLoader = servlet.getClass().getClassLoader(); | | MutableAttachments mutableAttachments = (MutableAttachments)deployment.getPredeterminedManagedObjects(); | mutableAttachments.addAttachment(ClassLoaderFactory.class, new ContextClassLoaderFactory(classLoader)); | mutableAttachments.addAttachment(JBossWebMetaData.class, jbwmd); | mainDeployer.deploy(deployment); | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205317#4205317 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205317

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Security Deployer assuming VFSDeploymentUnit

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

Thomas is creating a DU which is in memory and of type AbstractDeploymentUnit. The sec deployer is not happy as it expects a vfs DU. Maybe thomas needs to look at the vfs memory Du (something, like "vfsmemory://" A possibility is to create a deployer that goes before security deployer on demand and converts into a vfs DU. The other option is use vfs in-memory deployment. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205315#4205315 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205315

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Those terrible error messages

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

Committed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205314#4205314 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205314

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Security Deployer assuming VFSDeploymentUnit

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

There is some discussion that is related to this: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4123146#4123146 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205313#4205313 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205313

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Those terrible error messages

by alesj

"david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote : In any case, let me know if I shouldn't commit this, otherwise I will... today. :-) DML, DML, DML ... commit them both. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205311#4205311 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205311

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2009