June 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MC tools

by alesj

"flavia.rainone(a)jboss.com" wrote : | This is when you define one of the attributes xmbean-dd (external descriptor) or xmbean-code (embedded), in order to define the interface of the MBean. This is then similar to @ManagedX annotations? OK, leave it out atm. If there is some demand, we might persuade the one with the demand to do it. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236389#4236389 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236389

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JBoss Remoting Gateway using bogus HttpMarshaller?

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

According to your comment it was to add support for byte[], so the question really becomes 'why was it necessary to add this?'. I find it hard to believe you would do this for no good reason. Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236353#4236353 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236353

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Unused branches

by timfox

Guys (mainly Clebert and Howard), there are several old branches here: http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/messaging/branches/ That were created by you guys. If you don't need them any more, please say and I will delete them. Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236350#4236350 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236350

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - JBoss Remoting Gateway using bogus HttpMarshaller?

by tfennelly

This will seem like an unusual post :) A long time ago I added a HttpMarshaller class with the JBoss Remoting gateway code. For some reason (that now appears to be bizarre) I added code to unwrap JBossRemoting InvocationResponse types. I think I must have done this in error, but I'm not totally sure :) JBossRemoting (at least the CoyoteInvoker) wraps all response objects in a InvocationResponse instance where the client was a JBoss Remoting client. The code I added in the HttpMarshaller totally screws up JBoss Remoting clients as they are expecting an InvocationResponse in the response stream (has no effect on non JBoss Remoting clients). I think the handling of the InvocationResponse in the HttpMarshaller class is invalid and should be removed. Anyone know of a reason why it should not be removed? T. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236339#4236339 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236339

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MC tools

by flavia.rainone＠jboss.com

"alesj" wrote : "flavia.rainone(a)jboss.com" wrote : | | Regarding the convertion tool, what do I do with embedded XMBeans and with XMBeans with references to external descriptors? | | | It's been a while since I used this, so how does this exactly look like? | Although we have beans nested within beans, is this it? This is when you define one of the attributes xmbean-dd (external descriptor) or xmbean-code (embedded), in order to define the interface of the MBean. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236177#4236177 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236177

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MC tools

by alesj

"flavia.rainone(a)jboss.com" wrote : | Regarding the convertion tool, what do I do with embedded XMBeans and with XMBeans with references to external descriptors? | It's been a while since I used this, so how does this exactly look like? Although we have beans nested within beans, is this it? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236131#4236131 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236131

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MC tools

by flavia.rainone＠jboss.com

Ales, Regarding the convertion tool, what do I do with embedded XMBeans and with XMBeans with references to external descriptors? I'm guessing this is going to be unsupported feature, but let me know what you think. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236095#4236095 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236095

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-1844: Retry on rollback

by jaikiran

"jaikiran" wrote : can have multiple different type of sub-elements whose type is not known. | Or maybe the type of the sub-elements can be a common JBoss specific interface which the new elements implement. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235976#4235976 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235976

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-1844: Retry on rollback

by jaikiran

IMO, there should be a common location for all the jboss specific annotations. Hence i think the ejb3-ext-api is the right place for this. anonymous wrote : Also we need to be able to extend jboss-metadata to allow plugins, so that the retry function can be enabled via descriptors. | I am not really good at xml xsd and similar things, but i guess there would be some option available where in we can say a given xsd element (ex: sessionBeanType) can have multiple different type of sub-elements whose type is not known. Just an example in jboss.xml <session> | <tx-retry>numberofattempts</tx-retry> | ...// later on for some other functionality | <xyz>blahblahblah</xyz> | </session> View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235975#4235975 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235975

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Deployment Framework] - Re: JSR 250 injection on VDF

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

I'm also missing affected projects/components list here. AFAICS affected components are Web Services, Web Beans, EJB3, MC, Web Container, ... and probably others. We should identify all affected AS subprojects. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235966#4235966 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235966

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums June 2009