July 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Http Gateway - requirements please...

by tfennelly

Ok thanks... both those options were mentioned but I missed the urlPattern override bit. That's fine, thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246379#4246379 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246379

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Http Gateway - requirements please...

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

"tfennelly" wrote : So, as far as my understanding goes, there are no differences from a functional point of view (one query aside, which is below). I do have other parts to implement, but the merging of http and ebws is basically done and is done with min impact, as best I could. Fantastic Tom, thanks. "tfennelly" wrote : I do want to make sure we're on the same page re what you want the urls for the http gateway endpoints to be. At the moment, I have it as: | | | http://{host}/{.esbname}/http/{urlPattern_from_listener_config} | | | | There was also talk of doing something like: | | | http://{host}/{.esbname}/http/{service_cat}/{service_name}/{urlPattern_from_listener_config} | | | | It's easy change to the later if that's what you prefer. I wasn't sure. IIRC the suggestion from Dave was to use the {service_cat}/{service_name} as the default value of the urlPattern so the URL would either be http://{host}/{.esbname}/http/{service_cat}/{service_name} or, if a url pattern was specified http://{host}/{.esbname}/http/{urlPattern_from_listener_config} There should be something earlier in this thread, let me see if I can find it. Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246377#4246377 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246377

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - how to modify / filter memory profiler under 1.0?

by J*Dev

me again ;-) I now want to profile the memory using JBoss Profiler 1.0. Is there a way to avoid all kind of classes being displayed there? this is what I have in my JAVA_OPTS -XrunjbossInspector:/tmp,include=java.util.HashMap,ignore=* but the snapshots keep being unreadable long. regards, J View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246376#4246376 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246376

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Http Gateway - requirements please...

by tfennelly

Ok, thanks. So, as far as my understanding goes, there are no differences from a functional point of view (one query aside, which is below). I do have other parts to implement, but the merging of http and ebws is basically done and is done with min impact, as best I could. I do want to make sure we're on the same page re what you want the urls for the http gateway endpoints to be. At the moment, I have it as: | http://{host}/{.esbname}/http/{urlPattern_from_listener_config} | There was also talk of doing something like: | http://{host}/{.esbname}/http/{service_cat}/{service_name}/{urlPattern_from_listener_config} | It's easy change to the later if that's what you prefer. I wasn't sure. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246374#4246374 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246374

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Remoting issue

by jaikiran

Hi Ron, A few questions 1) Is the default destruction delay being maintained programatically within Remoting? I don't see this delay being added within the EJB3 remoting configurations 2) From what i understand in those threads, the issue was a socket being created on every method invocation on a remote EJB3 proxy. The destruction delay tries to fix this by delaying the destruction of the socket (and the subsequent creation of a new one). Did i understand this right? anonymous wrote : I've been informally suggesting 5 seconds as a reasonable default delay, but I'm wondering if anyone from the EJB3 team has any better intuition. Assuming, i understood the issue correctly, i guess the ideal timeout really depends on how the end users use the EJB3 proxies. Some users might have this: someClientMethod() | { | // lookup remote bean | Bean bean = ctx.lookup(...); | // invoke method | bean.doSomething(); // creates a socket | | // do something that takes a really long time | waitForUserInputOrSomeOtherTimeConsumingOperation(); | | // use the earlier proxy again | bean.doSomeOtherThing(); // creates a socket (again) | } | | | Although if the proxy is being used for multiple method invocations within that default timeout then the performance improvement is going to be noticeable. 3) What is the (performance) impact of specifying a very long destruction delay? Does it degrade the performance or introduce any other issues? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246373#4246373 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246373

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Http Gateway - requirements please...

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

"tfennelly" wrote : I haven't prefixed the EBWS endpoints with "ebws" yet - it's as it was. Do we really want to do this? If we do, then we need to provide backward compatibility support. Yes we want to do this. As for backward compatibility, changing the URL is very minor as there is no functional difference that needs to be worked around. Given the rest of the changes, and their impact, I would be willing just to document this as a change between 4.6/4.7 & SOA 4/5. "tfennelly" wrote : If there are specific changes that you feel are not required, let me know the specific instance(s). If there is anything that is different from what has previously been discussed then can you please let me know? Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246367#4246367 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246367

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: Class references in JBoss Profiler 2.0

by J*Dev

Ok, I think I've found the answer myself: There is no memory leak investigation in the 2.0 version, so I guess it will not be possible to display class references?!? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246360#4246360 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246360

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Class references in JBoss Profiler 2.0

by J*Dev

hello everybody, I have taken some snapshots with the 2.0beta4 version and was able to analyze them / generate the hmtl-files. my question: where can I see which classes are holding references of specific objects. e.g. when I want to see: which classes are holding HashMap references? thanks in advance, J View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246349#4246349 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246349

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Abstract Beans JBKERNEL-10

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

"marius.bogoevici" wrote : | One issue I encountered is that metadata such as PropertyMetaData is stored in a Set in the BeanMetaData, yet PropertyMetaData does not implement equals() and hashCode(). | | This leads to the possibility of writing definitions such as: | I ran into this as well. To add to the strangeness, the AbstractBeanMetaData.getProperty(String) method iterates the whole set looking for a matching property, incurring a O(n) overhead. BeanMetaDataBuilder does much the same (in this case, iterating the whole set to remove the duplicate-named property). In my opinion, the backing structure (in both BMD and BMDB) should be changed to a LinkedHashMap<String,PropertyMetaData> ensuring that properties are installed uniquely and in order. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246287#4246287 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246287

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Symmetric Cluster Example fails on a multi-core machine

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-1692 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246286#4246286 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246286

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2009